A Two-Week Batch of Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
Our runners-up at Hueston Hennigan landed a $175 million damages award against VPX, the maker of the "Bang" energy drink, after an arbitrator found it doesn't contain creatine.
April 15, 2022 at 07:25 AM
9 minute read
LitigatorsThe original version of this story was published on Litigation Daily
Our first runners-up are John Hueston, Moez Kaba and their team at Hueston Hennigan. Following a two-week Zoom trial last year, last week they landed a $175 million damages award against VPX, the maker of the "Bang" energy drink, after an arbitrator found the drink doesn't contain creatine. VPX could only use the "Bang" mark on "creatine-based" products or products sold in the vitamin and dietary supplement sections of stores under a 2010 agreement with drink maker Orange Bang, which was represented by counsel at Knobbe Martens in the litigation. The Hueston Hennigan team represented Monster Energy Company which took a partial assignment of Orange Bang's rights under the agreement with VPX to pursue breach of contract and trademark infringement claims. The arbitrator also awarded more than $9 million in attorney fees and costs and a 5% royalty on all future net sales of VPX's Bang-branded products. The Hueston Hennigan trial team also included Allison Libeu, Lauren McGrory Johnson, Sourabh Mishra, Brandon Marsh, Michael Todisco, Julia Haines, Justin Greer, Segun Babatunde and Amber Munoz.
Mike Lyle, Nelly Merkel and Keith Forst of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan also get a runner-up spot for their summary judgment win for Express Scripts in a closely watched healthcare dispute where Anthem Inc. was seeking $14.8 billion in damages. Late last month U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos in Manhattan ruled Express Scripts wasn't contractually obligated to provide Anthem competitive benchmark pricing for pharmacy benefits services, but only to negotiate in good faith.
Runners-up honors also go to Eamonn Gardner, Matthew Brigham, Dena Chen, Priya Viswanath, Stephen Smith and Jeffrey Karr of Cooley. Late last month U.S. District Judge Paul Byron in Orlando granted summary judgment of non-infringement to client Qualcomm on the last remaining 11 patents-in-suit in a long-running patent litigation brought by ParkerVision targeting aspects of virtually all the cellular transceiver products Qualcomm sold over a ten-year span.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
- Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Warton & Garrison
- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
- Covington & Burling
- Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co
- Cooley
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Kindel & Anderson
- Arnold & Porter
- Hunton Andrews Kurth
- Mayer Brown
- Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Morrison & Foerster LLP
- Knobbe Martens Olson
Trending Stories
- 1BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 2First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 4The Growing Tension—And Opportunity—in Big Law Nonequity Tiers
- 5The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250