Lawyers at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher denied they were “foot-dragging” and “stonewalling” discovery in privacy lawsuits against Facebook, arguing that a judge’s consideration of sanctions was based on a “false and misleading account” by the plaintiffs’ attorneys.
On Monday, Gibson Dunn partner Rosemarie Ring said her team was “mortified” by statements made at the last two status conferences by U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria of the Northern District of California, who suggested terminating or evidentiary sanctions might be on the table because of “dilatory discovery conduct.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]