The Massachusetts Court of Appeals has reversed a lower court’s order to extend an attorney-plaintiff’s protective order against a defendant, finding she was denied a meaningful opportunity to be heard.
The case of Idris I. v. Hazel H.—which are pseudonyms for the parties—came before Cambridge District Court Judge Ina R. Howard-Hogan to decide if the abuse prevention order should be continued after a different judge issued the ex parte order in March 2021.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
