The Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with an assistant principal on Friday, rejecting a “habitually truant” youth’s claim that the nonattorney school representative engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by filing and pursuing a Child Requiring Assistance (CRA) petition in juvenile court.

In April 2021, Lexington public schools assistant principal—who also oversees attendance but does not have a law degree—filed a CRA petition in the juvenile court, asserting that a 12-year-old child needed assistance because he had “excessive absences” and didn’t attend school for 48 days that school year, the high court’s opinion said. The petition further explained that the child and his family did not participate in a truancy prevention program.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]