COVID Court Cancellations Cause Consternation: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 12, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Litigation
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
COVID, COURT CANCELLATIONS AND CARDI B - Earlier this week, we told you about how a number of courts across the country have once again been forced to cancel in-person proceedings thanks to the rise of omicron. What we didn't get into, however, is just how much of a pain all this stopping and starting has been for litigators and their clients. For example, Monica Latin, managing partner at Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, told Law.com's Meghann Cuniff that her trial team was already settled into its hotel on Friday afternoon when a call came in that the jury trial set to begin Monday in an Austin, Texas, courtroom had been called off because of the region's rising COVID-19 infections. "It's like putting the racehorse into the starting gate and then calling off the race," Latin said, but added that "[i[t's impossible to second-guess any of these decisions under these circumstances." The last-minute cancellations are also agonizing for clients—well, some clients. "It is very important to our client that this case gets to trial without any more delays," said Lawrence J. Conlan of Cappello & Noël in Santa Barbara, who's suing rapper and songwriter Cardi B for copyright infringement. "Cardi has been trying to avoid trial with us for some time now, using a lot of excuses that don't add up."
FACE LITIGATION - A federal judge on Tuesday ruled the FTC's amended antitrust lawsuit against Meta (née Facebook) can move forward, determining the commission overcame many of the legal issues that doomed its initial complaint last year, Law.com's Andrew Goudsward reports. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg of the District of Columbia said the FTC, in its refiled complaint, laid out enough facts about Facebook's market power in the personal social networking space to constitute an antitrust case. The commission alleged that Facebook not only has a monopoly, but has actively maintained that status by acquiring potential competitors like Instagram and WhatsApp. Boasberg said the FTC's allegations are "far more robust and detailed" than in its initial complaint, which Boasberg dismissed last June, "particularly in regard to the contours of the defendant's alleged monopoly." The decision is a victory for the FTC and its chair, Lina Khan, who has made cracking down on large technology companies a major goal for the agency.
HEEL TURN? - Kasowitz Benson Torres filed an antitrust lawsuit Tuesday in California Northern District Court against World Wrestling Entertainment. The partially redacted complaint was brought on behalf of competing wrestling company MLW Media, which accuses the WWE of "poaching" talent, misappropriating confidential information and airing MLW footage without permission. MLW also contends that the WWE uses intimidation tactics to interfere with competitors' contracts, such as MLW's recent broadcasting agreement with Vice TV, and streaming agreement with Tubi of Fox Corp. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 3:22-cv-00179, MLW Media LLC v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Midsize Law Firm Consolidation Heats Up By Andrew Maloney New Orleans Judge Indicted for Allegedly Failing to Report Income From Performing Marriage Ceremonies By Marianna Wharry US Judge Says Avenatti Trial to Proceed as Planned, Despite Omicron Threat By Tom McParland Judge 'Reluctantly' Recuses From Amazon Case Over Wife's Stockholdings By Avalon Zoppo Judge Pushes Back Against Trump, Siblings' Motion to Dismiss Niece's Fraud Suit By Tom McParland|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
TECH TO EXPECT - From devising ways to tackle the increasing complexity of data security to improving professional development in a hybrid work environment, experts from across the U.K. legal sector envision major legal tech developments on the horizon in 2022, Law.com International's Jack Womack reports. One of the most interesting shifts in the landscape this year could come in the form of law firms figuring out how to utilize legal tech to do more than simply work faster and cheaper. "We've already seen a shift away from maximum efficiency being the primary motivator for technological advancement," said Christopher Tart-Roberts, head of the lawtech group at Macfarlanes: "Reducing time spent and increasing value for money are still very important drivers, and rightly so. However, tech advancement can also deliver value in a much wider sense. The opportunity for law firms to offer a range of complimentary products and services which bring together law + tech, and that satisfy the expectations of increasingly tech-savvy clients, is particularly exciting."
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"Take every opportunity and don't be afraid to step outside of your comfort zone. By taking on new challenges, I was able to advance in my career earlier than I ever would have expected."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Fifth Circuit Departs From Sister Courts on Copyright Infringement Damages
4 minute readSanta Rosa Firm Secures $46M Verdict for Plaintiff in Sonoma County Child Sexual Abuse Case
Which 1-Judge Division Districts Have Adopted Anti-Forum Shopping Guidance?
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250