'My Civil Calendar Is a Mess': Attorneys, Judges Rattled by COVID-19 Jury Trial Suspensions
The return to COVID-driven trial uncertainty in some districts has left not only attorneys in a lurch but also judges, many of whom already are facing massive caseloads and trial backlogs exacerbated by the first court closures in 2020.
January 11, 2022 at 05:24 PM
6 minute read
COVID-19The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Her trial team was already settled into the hotel when Monica Latin got the call Friday afternoon. The jury trial set to begin Monday in U.S. District Judge Robert L. Pitman's Austin, Texas, courtroom had been called off because of the region's rising COVID-19 infections.
"They'd already unloaded everything in the courthouse," Latin, managing partner at Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, said in an interview with Law.com. "It's like putting the racehorse into the starting gate and then calling off the race."
For months, Latin's Dallas-based firm had been booked this week for jury trials in both Texas and California, with Latin set to fly to Orange County to try a breach-of-contract lawsuit the firm brought on behalf of a technology staffing company. Now the trial calendar is empty, after Latin learned Jan. 3 that the Central District of California was suspending jury trials until at least Jan. 24.
"It's impossible to second-guess any of these decisions under these circumstances," Latin said. "I think all of the courts are making the best decisions that they can, and I think everyone appreciates that."
Federal courts across the country are announcing trial suspensions similar to the Central District's, including the Northern District of California in San Francisco, the District of New Jersey and the District of Connecticut. Others such as Pitman's Western District of Texas are still operating at the judges' discretion, which can mean last-minute delays like Latin's team experienced or rebuffed postponement requests like a trial team for 3M recently experienced with Judge M. Casey Rodgers in the Northern District of Florida.
|Trial Backlog 'Until Eternity'
This return to COVID-19-driven trial uncertainty in some districts has left not only attorneys in a lurch but also judges, many of whom already are facing massive caseloads and trial backlogs exacerbated by the first court closures in 2020.
The Central District didn't hold jury trials in any of its Los Angeles, Santa Ana or Riverside courthouses for 14 months, and the number of trials that could go at a time was still limited when juries returned last June.
U.S. District Judge John A. Kronstadt in Los Angeles told civil counsel in a Zoom hearing Monday that criminal matters will take priority once trials resume.
"I think we all have to recognize we can't have the level of certainty that we'd have under other circumstances," Kronstadt said.
Kronstadt's colleague, U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal, said "it's likely" the trial suspension will be extended, and he warned attorneys that the current Jan. 25 trial date is still tentative.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllForward-Looking Statements Don't Support Securities Case Against Peloton Following Pandemic Spike
2 minute readFederal Lawsuit Seeks $400M In COVID-19 PPE Commission Revenues to Be Handed Over
Judge: 'Perfect Adherence' to Religious Beliefs Not Necessary to Clear Discrimination Suit Against Former Employer
5 minute readEx-Nurse's 'Individualized, Idiosyncratic Religion' Claims Against COVID-19 Vaccination Mandate Allowed to Proceed, Judge Rules
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5Partner Cuts: The Grim Reality of Post-Merger Integration
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250