"Though Justice Thomas’ statement has no formal precedential value, it nevertheless represents the most explicit statement yet from a sitting–and conservative–Supreme Court justice that questions the rationality of current federal marijuana policy," one lawyer said.
July 01, 2021 at 04:46 PM
8 minute read
Welcome back to Higher Law, our weekly briefing on all things cannabis. I’m Cheryl Miller, reporting for Law.com from Sacramento. Happy Fourth of July!
This week we’re looking at: Justice Clarence Thomas’ critique of federal marijuana policies • New York and New Jersey: Recreational marijuana by the numbers • Georgia’s warning to cannabis lawyers • The familiar faces launching Holland & Hart’s cannabis practice
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
