Remote Work Hasn't Slowed Sexual Harassment | Virtual Law Firms May Sound Tempting, but They're Not For Everyone | Utah School Board Sued Over COVID Testing Policy: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
March 11, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
REVERTING TO TYPE - You might assume that one of the silver linings of the pandemic has been a decrease in workplace sexual harassment, given that so many workplaces have been shuttered for the past year. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case. As Law.com's Charles Toutant reports, incidents of unwelcome touching and physical contact seem to be declining, according to employment lawyers, but sexual harassment by electronic communications is seen as a growing problem. Working away from the office makes some harassers think the usual rules don't apply, some attorneys said. "The perpetrator of sexual harassment is emboldened now that they are unfettered by the four walls of the office environment," said Nina Pirrotti of Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti in New Haven, Connecticut. "Now that we're all working remotely, we are much less formal. That level of informality tends to embolden people to do or say things they would not normally do or say."
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION - A year in, the pandemic has made some attorneys long for a return to office life, while its made others curious about the prospect of taking their practice to a virtual platform for good. But, as Law.com's Dan Packel reports, leaders at these "distributed" firms say their model isn't a fit for everyone. They all agree that, in order to succeed in a firm like theirs, attorneys need to have their own books of business, comfort with technology and that rarest of traits in the legal profession: an appetite for risk. "Most attorneys are very good at identifying risk. But in assessing and assuming risk, attorneys are horrendous," Taylor English partner Chris Wilson said. "If you could come up with a test early on that would determine attorneys' ability to do this, I'd love that. People will tell you they can, but it isn't until the decision has to be made about going to join the firm or not join the firm. Then you figure out whether they can assume that risk."
NEGATIVE TEST? - Parsons Behle & Latimer filed a lawsuit yesterday in Utah District Court against the Summit County Health Department, the Park City School Board and other defendants over the Utah Department of Health's "Test to Stay" program, which allows schools to mandate the use of experimental COVID-19 testing on non-symptomatic minors. The complaint contends that the program, to which participation is a condition for receiving in-person public education, violates constitutionally protected rights of students and children. The suit was filed by two parents on behalf of their two minor children. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 2:21-cv-00148, McClure et al v. Saunders et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
5 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250