Did Boies Schiller Rep Elizabeth Holmes or Not? | Law Firm Collections Remain Strong | Meat Companies Hit With Antitrust Suit Over Pork Prices: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
December 23, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
ARE YOU MY LAWYER? - Prosecutors in the federal fraud case against Elizabeth Holmes claim that more than a dozen communications between Holmes and Boies Schiller Flexner are not covered by the attorney-client privilege because the firm didn't represent the Theranos founder personally and the company has waived its privileges. But Holmes' attorneys claim her "unique" relationship with the firm means those communications are protected. So what's the deal? Ashwin Ram, of Steptoe & Johnson LLP's Los Angeles office, told Law.com's Alaina Lancaster that it's easy for attorneys to lose sight of the fundamentals given the sheer volume of interviews that take place during a corporate investigation. "Even if an attorney gives the Upjohn warning in that first interview with the company, agent or executives, what about the next 100 times they talk?" he said. "Is the attorney really expected to keep repeating that, 'Hey, I'm not representing you. I'm representing the company'? No, and realistically, that doesn't happen. So that's I think where you could get into a gray area."
STUNNING REALIZATION - The year's almost out and law firm collections are still going swimmingly, according to firm leaders and industry observers, so that's pretty neat. Then again, it is still 2020 for nine more days, so there's always the possibility that an evil wizard could make all the world's money disappear or something. But assuming things continue on this trajectory, we're looking at a heck of a comeback story for the legal industry, all things considered. "The way the large firms have performed is actually pretty remarkable," Brad Hildebrandt, chairman of Hildebrandt Consulting, told Law.com's Justin Henry. "It turns out as the last quarter came about, many of the practices were showing a return, like M&A and private equity. Most firms at the end of the year are going to have increased revenue or at least the same revenue, and profits are going to be very high."
PIGGISH BEHAVIOR - Finally, a complaint with some real meat to it! (pause for laughter) Hormel Foods, Smithfield Foods, Tyson Foods and other defendants were hit with an antitrust lawsuit Tuesday in Minnesota District Court. The lawsuit, filed by Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC on behalf of Cheney Brothers Inc., alleges the defendants engaged in an "illegal conspiracy, which increased the prices of pork sold in the United States beginning at least as early as 2009 and continuing through the present." Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 0:20-cv-02642, Cheney Brothers, Inc. v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
5 minute readBig Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Reality TV Couple and Pacific Palisades Neighbors Sue City of Los Angeles Over Loss of Homes to Fire
- 2Colgate Faces Class Actions Over ‘Deceptive Marketing’ of Children’s Toothpaste
- 3Inside Track: AI Is Sure to Fray Big Law's Devotion to Billable Hour
- 4Evidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250