On Nov. 16, the U.K. business interruption insurance test case appeal began with several major insurance companies claiming to the U.K. Supreme Court that it is inappropriate to assume there could be unlimited coverage during a pandemic. The appeal was fast-tracked to the court for a four-day hearing.

Earlier this fall, a lower court found largely in favor of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and insureds, ruling that some insurers had wrongly rejected business interruption claims connected to the COVID-19 pandemic. Several insurers appealed parts of the ruling that they lost, maintaining that they are paying valid claims and that if they were required to pay all claims, despite the validity, the insurance industry would collapse.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]