Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Seth P. Waxman, a partner with Wilmer Pickering Cutler Hale and Dorr. Photo by Diego Radzinschi/ALM Seth Waxman, a partner with Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. (Courtesy photo)

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday appeared unlikely to reverse an $80 million Roundup verdict based on federal preemption, but at least one jurist questioned whether expert evidence allowed at trial set the appellate court apart from the rest of the country.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Amanda Bronstad

Amanda Bronstad is the ALM staff reporter covering class actions and mass torts nationwide. She writes the email dispatch Critical Mass. She is based in Los Angeles.

More from this author


Merit Systems Protection Board: Rights and RemediesBook

This authoritative volume guides you in practicing before the Merit Systems Protection Board and helps you understand the intricacies of the Civil Service Reform Act.

Get More Information

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.