Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here’s the sign-up.


UNCHAINED – The copyright clash of the titans in Google v. Oracle America may be the main event at today’s telephonic SCOTUS argument session, but there’s a pair of lesser known cases that could potentially be even more impactful for litigators across the country. Whip up some extra guacamole for your listening party and tune in for the arguments in Ford Motor Co. v. Bandemer and Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, which involve the question of when courts can exercise specific jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant in suits by injured plaintiffs. Montana and Minnesota plaintiffs sued Ford for alleged defects in cars manufactured and sold out of state but which led to injuries and deaths in the plaintiffs’ states. Those states’ supreme courts, exercising specific jurisdiction, said the suits could proceed. SCOTUS, however, has said previously that courts can exercise specific jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant only when the claims “arise out of or relate to” the defendant’s in-state activities. The outcome here could change the products liability landscape nationwide by expanding the forums in which these cases can be filed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]