Frequently, a decision on appeal will not end the case; instead, the court of appeals may remand the case to the district court to conduct additional proceedings, perhaps leading to a trial. Often, and even in the same case, a disappointed party may seek further review from the Supreme Court. The possibility of simultaneous district court and U.S. Supreme Court proceedings can be sorted out through a variety of procedures, such as a stay of the appellate court’s mandate, stays from the court of appeals of proceedings or remand, or even a stay from the Supreme Court.

In a per curiam opinion issued on Sept. 10, the Seventh Circuit held it was improper for a district court to stay proceedings pending the filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari. At least in a case in which a request to stay the mandate had been made to the court of appeals and denied, the district court’s stay violated the mandate rule. As a result, the Seventh Circuit granted the extraordinary remedy of a writ of mandamus.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]