In Estate of Narleski v. Gomes, the New Jersey Supreme Court weighed whether a young adult, over the age of 18 but under the legal drinking age of 21, has a duty to stop serving alcohol to a visibly intoxicated underage guest in his home, if that guest is expected to operate a motor vehicle later and pose a risk to others.

In a Thursday opinion, Justice Barry Albin said the answer was “yes.” The justices ruled 6-0 in favor of reversing the appellate court and making the ruling retroactive to the case at issue.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]