It's Hard to Be a Young Lawyer Right Now; Recruiters See Promising Signs for Black Lateral Hires; Booking Websites Sued by Budget Airline: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 08, 2020 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
CONCERNING DEVELOPMENT – After decades of deprioritizing associate development and well-being, law firm leaders have been obsessed the past few years with figuring out how to get—and keep—young lawyers engaged. But the pressures of the pandemic are beginning to endanger any recent progress made on that front. In our latest Law.com Trendspotter column, we look at the ways in which remote work, austerity measures and shifting legal demand have led to challenges for young lawyers, whose development was already progressing more slowly than it should have been even before COVID-19 threw the entire legal industry off-course.
HIRE PRIORITIES – The Black Lives Matter movement has pushed law firms to confront their shortcomings on racial equality. As Patrick Smith reports, some recruiters say they've noticed an uptick in firm interest in hiring Black lateral partners since May, when the murder of George Floyd sparked protests and conversations about racial injustice around the country. While this trend is encouraging, the onus remains on law firms to continue devoting significant resources to diverse hiring and retention. "Until 2020 we were under a veil of systemic racism that no one wanted to acknowledge," said Merle Vaughn, managing director and national law firm diversity practice leader at legal recruiting giant Major, Lindsey & Africa. "But Floyd's and other's deaths have lifted that veil, especially with firm leaders that want to be on the right side of history. Lateral recruitment is a major component of that. It used to be, hire a consultant and they make suggestions on what you should do. But if you want a diverse business or firm, you have to hire people and retain them. Period."
SKYSCRAPERS – If you've ever wondered how booking engines like Kayak and Priceline are able to work in harmony with so many competing airlines to determine which ones have the best prices for consumers, the answer may be…they don't. Discount airline Ryanair has sued Kayak.com, Priceline.com, Agoda.com and parent company Booking Holdings Friday in Delaware District Court for alleged violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The lawsuit, brought by Holland & Knight and Offit Kurman on Friday, accuses the defendants of illegally scraping the Ryanair website in violation of its terms of service, and says the booking sites have taken steps to circumvent Ryanair's efforts to block their activity. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. Read the full complaint and stay up to date on major litigation nationwide with Law.com's Legal Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
Skadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readAmex Latest Target as Regulators Scrutinize Whether Credit Card Issuers Deliver on Rewards Promises
The Law Firm Disrupted: Tech Investment Is Necessary Yet Expensive. The Big Four Have a Leg Up
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 2Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 3Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 4Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
- 5Gift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250