SF Superior Court Hearing Infiltrated With Music, Dancing, Attendees Say
The court's IT staff is looking to see how the situation can be avoided in the future, according to Ken Garcia, communications director for San Francisco County Superior Court.
July 14, 2020 at 06:39 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
An online state court hearing had some unexpected visitors on Monday.
San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ethan Schulman reportedly had to boot several disruptive participants from his law and motions Zoom hearing with dozens of attorneys. One lawyer described an incident that he witnessed as sounding like someone simply forgot to mute during the videoconference, while another attorney said the participants blasted music with expletives and danced.
The incident comes one week after a hacker presented pornographic images in a Florida court's Zoom hearing. During the coronavirus pandemic, Zoom Video Communications Inc. has come under fire for its privacy protocols as users flocked to the platform.
Attorney Alison Cordova says she was interrupted Monday while presenting arguments during Schulman's hearing, which often spans several hours. She was litigating a personal injury case against the city and county of San Francisco over a man who was shot and killed with a gun stolen from a police car.
Cordova's firm, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy in Burlingame, California, is co-leading a privacy class action against Zoom in the Northern District of California. The case involves allegations that the videoconferencing platform did not do enough to protect users from so-called Zoombombers.
She said the ordeal was frustrating. "We have professional, important things to get done," she said. "The public wants access to these hearings, and they should have it, but it shouldn't be abused."
During the hearing, Marc Randazza, of Randazza Legal Group, argued on behalf of 100 of Patreon Inc.'s third party users who are seeking mass arbitration against the company.
Randazza said that it sounded like a participant didn't shut off the microphone a couple times, and Schulman kicked the person out of the hearing. "It didn't seem to be mischief," he said.
Ken Garcia, the court's communications director, said that the hearing wasn't so much hacked "as it was people joining the video conference who had no reason to be there." Garcia did confirm that the incident involved the use of expletives. The court's IT staff is looking to see how the situation can be avoided in the future, he said.
Cordova said it appeared that Schulman didn't have an administrator helping him lead the technical aspects of the videoconference. But she said the judge remained calm and collected and repeatedly removed the offenders from the meeting. "Poor Judge Schulman was handling everything—that's a lot to put on a judge," she said.
The Zoom call-in info and password is listed on the court's website, which is one way the public could enter the meeting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute read'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readConsumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
4 minute read'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250