Legislation aimed at rooting out the discriminatory use of peremptory challenges in California jury selection sailed through the state Assembly on Friday without a hint of an intense debate taking place over the bill behind the scenes.
Since late May, the legislation has been the source of pointed exchanges among the Alliance of California Judges, other jurists and Assembly leaders over the role judicial officers should play in ensuring representative juries are chosen. The debate has played out as state judiciary leaders maneuver through public outrage at the death of George Floyd while in police custody and ethical canons that urge restraint in public comments.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]