Privacy advocates ask a judge to prohibit a California city's use of a controversial piece of surveillance equipment.
June 10, 2020 at 12:44 PM
1 minute read
Litigation editor
Welcome back for another week of What’s Next, where we report on the intersection of law and technology. Here’s what we’ve got for you today:
>> Privacy advocates ask a judge to prohibit a California city’s use of a controversial piece of surveillance equipment.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
