Grand Juries Should Be First Step in Court Reopenings, NY State DA Group Says
David Hoovler, president of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, wrote in a Monday letter that he knows of no counties that still have active grand juries impaneled.
April 29, 2020 at 05:55 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
New York's district attorneys association says impaneling grand juries should be a first step in "reopening" the courts after coronavirus lockdown measures expire in mid-May, at least for counties with lowered infection rates.
David Hoovler, president of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, wrote in a Monday letter that he knows of no counties that still have active grand juries impaneled. Hoovler, the district attorney in Orange County, reported that no new grand juries have been impaneled since sweeping lockdown rules were implemented.
New York state continues to remain under those restrictions, which sharply curtail gatherings and require nonessential workers to stay home. The measures, which are aimed at reducing the in-person interactions that spread COVID-19, are in place until mid-May.
Hoovler's letter was addressed to New York Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks, who said last week there are no conversations around the widespread opening of courthouses. There are virtual court operations statewide and the court system says it plans to expand access under that model.
Hoovler said enlisting grand juries is an important step to secure civilian witnesses, preserve testimony and issue necessary subpoenas.
"Counties with lower infection rates might be able to begin certain court functions, such as impaneling grand juries, before other counties," he wrote in the letter. "An inventory of existing infrastructure would show which counties have facilities that could accommodate appropriate social distancing in grand jury rooms."
Court openings in certain counties could come in a physical or virtual form, Hoovler said Wednesday.
Meanwhile, Gov. Andrew Cuomo has outlined ground rules on when regions could see their economies reopen. A raft of businesses statewide were forced to close down due to sweeping coronavirus lockdown measures.
The first phase of the plan would include reopening manufacturing and construction operations that are low risk.
More businesses are expected to open in the second phase of the plan. But reopening decisions in phase two, Cuomo said, will be based on how essential the business is and the infection risk associated with operating the business.
There's expected to be a two-week period between the phases in order to monitor the rate of infection.
READ MORE:
|Legal Industry Not First in Line as Cuomo Outlines Reopening Plan for New York Businesses
|'A Very Different Court System': Marks Says There's No Timeline for Lifting Ban on New 'Nonessential' Lawsuits in NY
|'Herculean Effort': DiFiore Hails Results of NY's Expanded Virtual Court Operations
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Ex-Assistant State Attorney Suspended for One Year for Dishonesty on Judicial Application, Job Interviews
5 minute readState Law Requiring Sex Offenders Display 'No Candy or Treats at This Residence' Sign Deemed Unconstitutional
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250