Critical Mass: Leading Plaintiffs' Firms Prepping for Onslaught of COVID-19 Lawsuits. Pandemic Prompts Pharmacies to Postpone Deadlines in Opioid Case.
Prominent plaintiffs' firms are starting to file a wide range of lawsuits over COVID-19.
April 01, 2020 at 12:38 PM
5 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing for class action and mass tort attorneys. I hope everyone is staying safe and healthy. Prominent plaintiffs' firms are starting to file a wide range of lawsuits over COVID-19. And pharmacies, citing their own roles in the pandemic, want a 60-day delay of deadlines in the opioid case set for trial. Meanwhile, which firms sued Zoom over alleged privacy violations?
Feel free to reach out to me with your input. You can email me at [email protected], or follow me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw.
Prominent Plaintiffs' Firms Pounce on Pandemic Suits
Prominent plaintiffs' firms are filing lawsuits over COVID-19, with DiCello Levitt and Bursor & Fisher bringing class actions on Friday against 24 Hour Fitness and the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of customers who want their money back.
Meanwhile, Milberg Phillips Grossman, Sanders Phillips Grossman and Greg Coleman Law teamed up to create a Coronavirus Litigation Task Force, which involves about 30 attorneys. That group will focus on workers' compensation, insurance coverage, products liability involving protective gear and class actions, such as antitrust and consumer fraud—areas already spawning lawsuits over alleged price gouging and invalid health claims.
I asked Tina Bullock [Sanders Phillips Grossman] which cases she expected her team to file first. Here's what she said:
"I would think the products would come before some of the business interruption claims, but they're both moving so fast it's like a legal pandemic. A lot of our attorneys are working literally night and day on this, and it's hard to predict how fast. Usually it takes us a week or two to draft a complaint, and the speed of this is moving as the urgency of trying to protect people would prompt us to act much faster."
Amid COVID-19, Pharmacies Seek Opioid Case Delays
Citing their roles as "essential businesses" in the COVID-19 outbreak, a group of pharmacies have asked a federal judge to delay upcoming depositions and discovery deadlines in a leading opioid case against them by 60 more days. The pharmacies, which include CVS and Rite Aid, are set to go to trial on Nov. 9.
Lawyers on the plaintiffs' executive committee opposed the motion but suggested that counsel "hold the current litigation deadlines" and reevaluate the situation on April 20.
U.S. District Judge Dan Polster hasn't ruled yet, but, on Monday, special master David Cohen emailed lawyers saying he would not extend deadlines for document production. But he did say:
"Regarding depositions, the court believes it is likely there will need to be deadline extensions, but the court will wait and assess this on April 28, 2020."
Who Got the Work?
Video-conferencing company Zoom Video Communications was hit with two class actions alleging its service, which has become ubiquitous as more employees work from home, is illegally disclosing personal information to Facebook and others. Both were filed this week in California's Northern District. Mark Tamblyn and Kenneth Wexler (Wexler Wallace) and Daniel Gustafson, David Goodwin and Ling Wang (Gustafson Gluek), filed a case on Monday, and Hassan Zavareei, Katherine Aizpuru and Annick Persinger (Tycko & Zavareei) filed another on Tuesday.
Here's what else is happening:
Dicamba Demur: Bayer moved to toss last month's $265 million dicamba verdict, citing the jury's "novel theory" that Monsanto could be held liable for the actions of third parties involving another company's herbicide. In motions filed on Friday, Bayer also called the $250 million in punitive damages excessive, unconstitutional and "the result of passion and prejudice." The trial was the first to find that dicamba herbicides made by Monsanto and BASF, another defendant, drifted into neighboring fields, damaging crops.
Postmates Sues: In the latest skirmish between Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Keller Lenkner, Postmates has sued more than 10,000 of the delivery service's carriers for filing multiple arbitration demands in order to "extract a ransom-style settlement." In February, Keller Lenkner, which represents the Postmates carriers, won a motion to compel in a similar case involving 6,000 carriers for DoorDash, another Gibson Dunn client.
Apple Slices: In her latest ruling to address standing to sue in a class action, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh partially dismissed a case alleging Apple deceived customers into overpaying for iCloud subscriptions since their content was stored by Amazon, Microsoft, Google and others that offered cheaper services. On Friday, Koh found that class members who did not actually pay for a subscription did not have standing to pursue injunctive relief. Beatriz Mejia, Matthew Brown and Lauren Pomeroy (Cooley) represented Apple against plaintiffs' attorneys Roy Katriel (The Katriel Law Firm) and Azra Mehdi (The Mehdi Firm).
Thanks for reading Critical Mass! I'll be back next week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250