Coppertone Makers Hit With Class Action Over 'Mineral-Based' Sunscreen Label
The suit against Bayer Healthcare and skincare company Beiersdorf claims that Coppertone products promoted as mineral-based in some instances have a larger percentage of chemical active ingredients than mineral active ingredients.
January 06, 2020 at 02:46 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The companies behind the Coppertone line of sunscreens have been hit with a lawsuit claiming they misled consumers into buying products labeled as mineral-based that actually contained a significant proportion of chemical active ingredients.
The lawsuit filed Jan. 3 in federal court in the Northern District of California claims that consumers were misled to pay more for the "mineral-based" products amid growing concern about the potential adverse health effects of chemical-based sunscreens, whose active ingredients can penetrate the skin and enter the bloodstream.
The suit claims that the defendants, including Bayer HealthCare, skincare company Beiersdorf and parent companies and subsidiaries affiliated with the two companies, made "a calculated business decision to put profits over people" in how they marketed Coppertone WaterBabies Mineral-Based Sunscreen Stick; Coppertone WaterBabies Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion; Coppertone Kids Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion; and Coppertone Sport Face Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion.
"Defendants have done so at the expense of unwitting consumers—many of whom seek to protect their babies and children—and defendants' lawfully acting competitors, over whom defendants have an unfair competitive advantage," wrote the plaintiffs lawyers at Los Angeles' Clarkson Law Firm and Palo Alto's Moon Law.
The lawsuit brings claims under the state's unfair competition law, false advertising law, and consumer remedies act on behalf of a proposed class of California consumers who've purchased the products over the past four years. The suit also seeks to certify a nationwide class and California subclass to pursue claims that the companies breached an express warranty to provide a mineral-based product and to pursue claims of unjust enrichment. The suit also seeks an injunction barring further promotion of the Coppertone products as "mineral-based."
A representative from Beiersdorf said Monday the company cannot comment on pending litigation. A from Bayer Healthcare didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Shireen Clarkson of the Clarkson Law Firm wasn't immediately available for comment Monday.
In September 2019, Bayer AG sold the Coppertone brand, including the accused products, for $550 million to Beiersdorf AG.
Read more:
Diet Dr Pepper Doesn't Mislead Consumers, Appeals Court Says
In Kona Beer Settlement, Prison Inmates Demand to Be Included in Class (Hey, It's a Free $10)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Marathon General Counsel Takes Legal Reins of Another Energy Company
Thwarting of $14B US Steel Deal Won't Dampen Japan-U.S. M&A, Lawyers Say
'True Leadership Is About Putting Others First': 2024 In-House Award Winners Inspired, Took Road Less Traveled
Trending Stories
- 1California Lawmakers Reach $50M Deal to Fund Legal Fights Against Trump
- 2Supreme Court Wrestles With Disabled Ex-Firefighter's Discrimination Case
- 3NJ Firm Narrowly Avoids Case Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Fed Court
- 4Arbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
- 5Plaintiff Narrowly Avoids Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250