The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that a civil litigant’s First Amendment rights were violated when a U.S. district court judge ordered him to stop writing letters to shareholders of a bank that had sued him.
A litigant’s speech may not be curbed without a finding restrictions are necessary to protect the fairness or integrity of the proceeding, that the speech risks harming the litigation, that the restriction will alleviate the particular harm, and that less-restrictive measures will not suffice, the appeals court said in a precedential ruling Tuesday. The magistrate judge and district judge in the case at hand made no such findings and considered no such alternatives, the appeals court said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]