Critical Mass: Juul's Legal Cloud Just Got Larger. Opposition Widens Over Opioid Trial. Lawyers Say Boat Fire's Cause Still Murky.
The FDA adds firepower to lawsuits alleging Juul falsely marketed its e-cigarettes as safe.
September 12, 2019 at 11:13 AM
6 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing for class action and mass tort attorneys. The FDA adds firepower to lawsuits alleging Juul falsely marketed its e-cigarettes as safe. Why are so many groups objecting to next month's opioid trial? And here's what lawyers are looking at in the California boat fire.
Feel free to reach out to me with your input. You can email me at [email protected], or follow me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw
|
Juul Under Fire for Marketing Claims
Where there's smoke, there's fire. At least, that seems to be the case in the legal cloud over Juul Labs, after the FDA sent this letter on Monday to its CEO demanding to know more about its marketing claims—in particular, that its e-cigarettes are safer than traditional cigarettes.
What got the FDA fired up? For one thing, evidence was presented before a U.S. House subcommittee in July that Juul's executives had made such claims about their e-cigarettes to school children. In a second letter (see here), the FDA sought documentation about Juul's marketing, including its "Make the Switch" campaign targeted to smokers.
The letters caught the attention of plaintiffs' lawyers who have filed lawsuits targeting JuulL's marketing. Right now, attorneys are duking it out over which judge should hear their cases, and the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation hears arguments later this month.
I spoke to two plaintiffs' attorneys: Scott Schlesinger (Schlesinger Law Offices), who has filed a class action to take Juul's e-cigarettes off the market, and Joseph VanZandt (Beasley Allen), whose firm has filed several personal injury lawsuits.
Here's what they told me about the FDA's action :
Schlesinger: "They said it appears to us you're marketing your products as a safer alternative to tobacco cigarettes, but you can't do that because the federal government has to pass on that. And it has to give you permission to say it's safer."
VanZandt: "The FDA basically is telling Juul what we've been screaming from the rooftops for the last several months: that they discovered they were in fact targeting minors with their products with their marketing. And not only that, they were making false claims about the safety of Juul not just to minors but the population in general. This is very significant for the litigation and certainly it's a blow to Juul."
|
Opposed to next month's opioid trial? Get in line.
It's starting to look like nobody wants to go to next month's bellwether trial over the opioid crisis. Another defendant, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, reached a $30 million deal with the two Ohio counties serving as plaintiffs in the trial, set for Oct. 21 in federal court in Cleveland. Other defendants, Endo International and Allergan, reached settlements last month totaling $15 million.
But that's not all. Thirteen states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief in support of Ohio AG Dave Yost's emergency writ before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to halt the trial. And they're not the only ones: the U.S. Chamber of Commerce also filed a supporting amicus brief, citing the "troubling surge of civil lawsuits against businesses brought by cities, counties, and other municipalities."
Meanwhile, U.S. District Judge Dan Polster, who plans to oversee the trial, continues to side with plaintiffs in summary judgment orders out this month. This week, he found that public nuisance claims and racketeering allegations should go before a jury.
And there is still a good chance for a global settlement. On Tuesday, a special master whom Polster appointed to look into a proposal from lead plaintiffs' counsel to create a "negotiation" class that could resolve the legal claims of 33,000 cities and counties gave a green light to the idea's most controversial elements.
|
A Deep Dive for Lawyers Suing Over Boat Fire
The owners of a scuba diving boat that caught fire off the coast of Southern California over Labor Day weekend have filed a legal action to limit their liability. The fire broke out at night, killing 34 people who were sleeping below deck. Truth Aquatics Inc., which owned the boat, called Conception, is represented by Russell Brown and James Kuhne (Gordon Rees).
The cause of the fire remains unknown, and the NTSB and Coast Guard are investigating, assisted by the FBI and ATF.
I talked to two lawyers at Baum Hedlund with experience in alleged negligence at sea: Clay Robbins, who represents victims injured by "lava bombs" on a tour boat near Hawaii's Kilauea volcano, and Timothy Loranger, a scuba diver who actually was on the Conception about 20 years ago.
Robbins: "The question becomes, what emergency lighting was available to guide the passengers and crew members to the exits that should have been more prominently provided? We're looking at those issues, as well as questions concerning the adequacy of the fire alarms. It seems that nobody down below was at all aware of a fire progressing until it was too late for them."
Loranger: "What we're learning right now, the way the boat was configured, even with a good briefing on where the exits are, and how you might get out, in this case the passengers might not have been able to get out because of where the escape hatch was located—for example, close to where the doors are that exit where the galley is."
Here's what else is happening:
Talc Trouble: Johnson & Johnson has moved for a mistrial in a high-profile talcum powder case after the New Jersey judge struck its lawyer's entire closing argument. Diane Sullivan (Weil Gotshal) filed the motion after Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Ana Viscomi struck her closing argument last week in a trial involving four plaintiffs who alleged Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products caused their mesothelioma. The judge then allowed plaintiffs' attorneys to make a closing argument "soaked with venom," the motion says. Plaintiffs' attorney Chris Panatier, (Simon Greenstone Panatier) said the mistrial motion was part of Sullivan's "strategy to try the case against the lawyers rather than on the evidence."
FAIR Act Passes: The U.S. House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday passed bipartisan legislation that would halt forced arbitration provisions. The Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act, or FAIR act, would allow plaintiffs to sue in federal courts for things like sexual harassment and consumer fraud. American Association for Justice CEO Linda Lipsen said the bill "is the first of its kind to reach this critical step in the legislative process—a truly monumental step in the fight to rein in corporate immunity."
Walmart Security: A couple who was injured in a Walmart in El Paso by a mass shooter last month has filed what could be the first legal action, claiming the retail giant was negligent by not providing proper security. Plaintiffs' attorney Rob Ammons (The Ammons Law Firm) filed a verified petition in El Paso County District Court to take the depositions of Walmart representatives.
Thanks for reading Critical Mass! I'll be back next week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1People in the News—Dec. 12, 2024—Pietragallo Gordon, Fox Rothschild
- 2Recent Decisions from the United States District Court for the Eastern District
- 3SoundCloud GC Takes Legal Reins of Condé Nast at Tumultuous Time
- 4When Dealing With Child Abuse Cases, Attorneys Need to Know How Children Perceive Time
- 5Like a Life Raft: Ben Brafman Reflects on Nearly 50 Years as a Defense Attorney
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250