GC of Steve Madden: Lead With a Good Sense of Humor
Michael Paradise, executive vice president and general counsel at the eponymous footwear and fashion company Steve Madden, spoke with Corporate Counsel about the impact of trade tensions and how the company protects its intellectual property.
September 02, 2019 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Little did Michael Paradise realize that someday he would work for the acquaintance he once knew growing up in the same Long Island town. But today, Paradise does just that as the executive vice president and general counsel at the eponymous footwear and fashion company Steve Madden.
A longtime corporate lawyer who once founded a hedge fund and venture capital firm, Paradise was working as outside counsel to Steve Madden at mid-sized New York firm McLaughlin & Stern when the opportunity to become the top lawyer arose in May 2016. For the past three years, Paradise has overseen Steve Madden's team of three in-house lawyers, including one who oversees the company's sustainability and corporate social responsibility division and one who manages the worldwide intellectual property department.
Paradise spoke with reporter Kristen Rasmussen about the impact of trade tensions and how the company protects its intellectual property. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
Steve Madden is among the U.S. companies that have been outspoken about their plans to move some production out of China given continued trade tensions with the country. What has been the legal department's role in that decision?
We've had an ancillary role. It is really our finance people and tax experts who are on top of this in terms of migrating some products away from the high tariff zones. Everything is up in the air now as to the prospect of long-term tariffs. We're hopeful that through negotiation the two countries can resolve the matter. But capacity issues will always exist and, because of the potential high demand, prices may go up in the end. Nobody knows now whether it's the smart choice to move elsewhere.
What is the legal department's role in an industry that is so quickly changing?
Whether our retail presence expands or contracts, there are always the issues such as our outstanding leases that the legal department has to handle. When [the company] is looking at more of a business-driven situation, we are there as consultants on how to lessen our exposure.
What is your philosophy about IP protection?
We have streamlined our IP group and have a very robust IP portfolio, to which we are now adding trademarks. As far as litigation, we have taken a somewhat aggressive stance against those who send frivolous demand letters alleging trade dress rights in products that are more functional than specialized. We've been aggressive in opposing counterparties in their unreasonable attempts to claim infringement.
What are your tips for those wanting to lead a corporate law department?
Become smarter, not just in your specific practice area but in the law itself. Follow various cases involving many companies to see where mistakes were made that led to sometimes catastrophic litigation. Understand business and know how to read financial statements. Also, be personable and remember that sometimes a good sense of humor helps as well.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Grants FTC Motion Blocking Proposed Kroger-Albertsons Merger
3 minute readTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
Trending Stories
- 1What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 2Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 3US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 4‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
- 53 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250