A California judge reduced a $2 billion Roundup verdict to a fraction of that amount on Thursday, but it’s Monsanto who is gearing up for an appeal.

Why? Because the judge refused to toss out the verdict altogether and, although she reduced the award to $86.7 million, she also found there was “clear and convincing evidence” that Monsanto’s actions were “reprehensible” and showed a “conscious disregard for health.” That finding, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Winifred Smith wrote, sufficiently warranted punitive damages, which she calculated at four times the compensatory damages.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]