(top, left to right) Alan Lourie, Timothy Dyk, and Todd Hughes..(bottom, left to right) Kimberly Moore, Pauline Newman, and Kara Stoll. Top, left to right: Alan Lourie, Timothy Dyk and Todd Hughes. Bottom, left to right: Kimberly Moore, Pauline Newman and Kara Stoll.

Unanimity is rare at the famously factious U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. But all 12 active judges found something they could agree on Wednesday: The Supreme Court is flat-out wrong when it comes to patent eligibility and medical diagnostics.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]