A U.S. Labor Department judge appears to be growing increasingly concerned about the sharp litigation tactics unfolding in the federal agency’s pay-discrimination case against the tech company Oracle Corp., a dispute that has been bitterly fought for more than two years.
Both sides in the case—Oracle is represented by a team from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe—recently tried to convince the judge to reprimand the other side amid allegations of misconduct and misrepresentations. Labor Department attorneys unsuccessfully accused Oracle’s lawyers of witness intimidation. The Orrick team, meanwhile, argued the labor agency’s lawyers made misrepresentations about the case when they reached out to Oracle employees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]