Tom Girardi Among Lawyers Who Will Vet California Judges
More than 100 trial court judges, state appellate justices, county prosecutors, litigators and former state bar leaders will serve on eight regional committees.
June 26, 2019 at 01:11 PM
4 minute read
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has chosen more than 100 judges, plaintiffs lawyers, Big Law partners and in-house attorneys from around the state to guide him on filling judicial vacancies, his office said Wednesday.
The 111 trial court judges, state appellate justices, county prosecutors, litigators and former state bar leaders will serve on eight regional committees charged with providing the governor and Judicial Appointments Secretary Martin Jenkins with “preliminary, non-partisan feedback” on applicants for the bench.
Several plaintiffs lawyers were picked for advisers, and among them is Thomas Girardi, the prominent Beverly Hills lawyer who was recently hit with suits in Los Angeles and Arizona over allegedly failing to make certain loan payments.
Also chosen was Paul Grewal, deputy general counsel at Facebook and a former U.S. magistrate judge in California's Northern District, who will vet candidates from the San Francisco Bay Area. Joining Grewal on the Bay Area committee is Lindbergh Porter, chair of Littler Mendelson's board of directors.
Former state Supreme Court Justice Carlos Moreno will serve on the Los Angeles County committee alongside Girardi, who was not immediately reached for comment. The Los Angeles committee also includes Roman Silberfeld of Robins Kaplan and eight Los Angeles Superior Court judges.
Joining Grewal on the Bay Area committee is Lindbergh Porter, chair of Littler Mendelson's board of directors, and Quyen Ta, a Boies Schiller Flexner partner who focuses on class action defense.
Jinnifer Pitcher, a senior associate at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in Sacramento, will serve on the Northern California committee. Cooley partner Michael Attanasio, chair of the firm's global litigation team, will serve as an adviser on the San Diego committee.
The regional advisers as described by Newsom's office will make up a more formal vetting structure than the one used by Gov. Jerry Brown, who relied on an inner circle of advisers and his own quizzing of some judicial candidates.
Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger employed a system—similar to the one outlined by Newsom—of regional screening committees. But there was one significant difference: Schwarzenegger refused to identify his private advisers, a practice that so angered some legislative Democrats that they introduced ultimately unsuccessful legislation to unmask them.
“The people of our state have little insight on the process by which judges are chosen,” Newsom said in a prepared statement. “It is only fair that the public knows who is helping to select the people who will serve them.”
Jenkins chose the 111 advisers based on their good standing with the bar and their diversity with respect to race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation and practice area, according to the governor's office.
Three former presidents of the California State Bar were named: Holly Fujie, now a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge; Luis Rodriguez, division chief of the Los Angeles County Public Defender's Office; and Michael Colantuono, a municipal law specialist with Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley in Grass Valley.
Jenkins also chose from the ranks of the biggest plaintiffs firms in the state. Five advisers are consumer attorneys who donated, or whose firms donated, more than $253,000 combined to Newsom's gubernatorial campaign.
The regional advisory committees will meet at the request of Jenkins and “provide feedback on candidates' legal acumen, work ethic, temperament and demonstrated commitment to public service” before their names are forwarded to Newsom, the governor's office said.
Attorneys interested in becoming a judge should not contact the advisers directly, according to the governor's office, but should instead start the application process on the administration's website.
The full list of regional advisers is posted below:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit Asks California Supreme Court to Expand Use of Electronic Case Recording
4 minute readJudge Reduces Attorneys' Award in Boston Sidewalk Settlement for Repetitive Billing
4 minute readEthics Charges Filed Against Judge Accused of Helping Defendant Escape ICE Detention
'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 2OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 34th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 4Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
- 5How the Trump II Administration Can Combat Antisemitism
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250