A federal judge in Maryland has tossed a former Accenture in-house lawyer’s age discrimination suit against the global management consulting and professional services firm, ruling that the man was fired because of poor communication skills and aggressive emails to his boss.
U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis of the District of Maryland, sitting in Greenbelt, Maryland, also rejected plaintiff Joseph Mott’s claim that firing him because of “his resistance to changes” was discriminatory. Mott was 61 when hired in December 2014 as senior manager in the global offerings support team in the compliance, offerings, regulatory and ethics division of Accenture’s legal department, according to Xinis’ April 29 memo supporting her grant of Accenture’s motion for summary judgment. Mott, who had worked as a lawyer for 35 years, including 10 years in the health care regulatory field, prior to joining Accenture, was 63 when fired in November 2016.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]