For those tracking litigation over biometric data, a decision from the Illinois Supreme Court in late January was a game changer. In Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment, the court held that a violation of the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act, or BIPA, is enough to confer standing even without a concrete showing of harm. Cue the class actions!

Morrison & Foerster partner Julie ONeill and associate Max Phillip Zidel recently wrote about the decision, highlighting the emerging conflict on BIPA between state and federal courts. We checked in for their take on the standing question and to ask how companies can collect and use biometric data without becoming an easy target for litigation.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]