Welcome to Labor of Law. There’s a lot to unpack this week—updates on a closely watched pregnancy discrimination case, and a new ruling in the gender-pay arena. Plus: Cohen Milstein’s targeting IBM for alleged age discrimination, and Wall Street firms are more than ever disclosing a new risk: sexual harassment. I’m Mike Scarcella in Washington, your host this week. You can reach me at [email protected] and follow me on Twitter @MikeScarcella. Thanks for reading!

Pregnant Workers Don’t Get ‘Most Favored Nation Status,’ Employer Tells Court

The phrase “most favored nation” made quite a few appearances in the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Young v. United Parcel Service—which wasn’t an international trade case but a workplace pregnancy discrimination dispute. The ruling—heraldedas a victory for pregnant workers—is now is getting renewed attention in a federal appeals court, and the lawyers defending the accused company just weighed in.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]