Jessie Liu Withdraws From Consideration for No. 3 Post at Main Justice
Liu, former vice president of the National Association of Women Lawyers, reportedly face Republican opposition over her group's criticism of Samuel Alito's nomination to the Supreme Court in 2005.
March 28, 2019 at 06:45 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Jessie Liu, the Trump administration's pick for third-in-command at the U.S. Justice Department, withdrew from consideration Thursday after reportedly facing opposition from members of the Senate Judiciary Committee over her past association with a legal group that opposed Justice Samuel Alito's nomination to the Supreme Court.
Liu, the U.S. attorney in Washington, had been recommended for the role by Attorney General William Barr. The Justice Department did not immediately comment on why Liu had withdrawn her name from consideration.
Reuters and the Associated Press said Liu faced opposition on Capitol Hill over her affiliation with a women lawyers group that had expressed criticism in 2006 of Alito's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Liu formerly was vice president of the National Association of Women Lawyers, a post she held from 2005 to 2006. The National Law Journal reported earlier this month that one of the association's committees in 2006 evaluated Alito and rated him “not qualified from a women's rights perspective.”
Alito, the committee said in a statement then, “has shown a disinclination to protect or advance women's rights.” Liu's name appeared on the letter the group sent to members of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee.
The women lawyers committee said one of its primary concerns was “Alito's stance on women's reproductive rights” and that Alito would be replacing Sandra Day O'Connor, “who has been a decisive vote in a number of cases involving the rights of women and laws that have special impact on women.”
When the National Law Journal first reported on the Liu's ties to the Alito letter, the Justice Department said she had not been involved in the review of the then-U.S. appeals court judge. Liu told the National Review that she supported Alito's nomination to the Supreme Court and that she disagreed with the National Association of Women Lawyers evaluation of the nominee.
The National Review also reported that Liu “signed a letter of Yale Law School alumni in support of Alito's nomination, joining a number of conservative legal luminaries, including John Yoo, Steven Calabresi, George Conway, and Senator Josh Hawley.”
Barr said in a statement Thursday: “Jessie Liu is one of the finest, most impressive people serving in the Department of Justice. She has been an outstanding United States attorney and would have made an outstanding associate attorney general. I have zero doubt she would have faithfully executed my priorities and advanced my rule-of-law agenda.”
On Thursday, Barr appointed Liu as chairwoman of his advisory committee of U.S. attorneys. In a prepared statement, Barr hailed her as “an outstanding attorney with broad experience, is widely-respected, within the Department.” Barr also noted that Liu leads more than 300 prosecutors in the largest U.S. attorney's office. “Jessie will be an integral part of our leadership at the department. We will all benefit from her universally-regarded expertise and dedication to public service.”
Before President Donald Trump took office, Liu had been a partner Jenner & Block and then Morrison & Foerster. She initially joined the administration as deputy general counsel for the Treasury Department before taking the helm of the U.S. attorney's office in Washington in September 2017.
The Trump administration did not immediately name a new nominee for the No. 3 role at the Justice Department.
|Read more:
Jessie Liu's Women Lawyers' Group Opposed Alito—and 5 Other Things to Know
How Mueller's Report Lands in Court: Congress, FOIAs and Defendants
|Mike Scarcella contributed reporting from Washington.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Reaches Settlements With Two Companies on Claims of Selling Sensitive Location Data
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute read'That Decision was Wrong:' Federal Judge Rethinks Consumer Protection Class Certification
Trending Stories
- 1Justices Will Weigh Constitutionality of Law Allowing Terror Victims to Sue PLO
- 2Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 3OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 44th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 5Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250