A California appeals court has upheld the University of Southern California’s expulsion of a former law student who cheated in an attempt to get onto law review, then tried to pin the blame on a classmate once she was discovered.
Claudine Tinsman had argued that she was suffering from mental illness at the time of her transgressions, and that the university had not properly followed a lower court’s directive to reconsider her case in light of that disclosure. But a three-judge panel of Division Seven of the Second Appellate District on Monday ruled that a subsequent university misconduct panel had appropriately weighed Tinsman’s mental illness when it recommended for a second time that she should be expelled. Expulsion is the appropriate sanction for the severity of her offenses—which included criminal acts—even in light of her mental illness, that panel found.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]