Photo: Akshdeep Kaur Raked/Shutterstock.com
A San Diego jury liked a Qualcomm patent infringement case against Apple more than an International Trade Commission judge did.
The stakes will be much higher at next month's antitrust trial, but Friday's verdict shows that Qualcomm is capable of mounting a persuasive case against Apple.
March 15, 2019 at 10:02 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Photo: Akshdeep Kaur Raked/Shutterstock.com
A San Diego jury liked a Qualcomm patent infringement case against Apple more than an International Trade Commission judge did.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS