That was quick.
Six California trial court judges chosen last week to consider the state’s appeal of a decision awarding current and retired judicial officers $36 million in back pay have unanimously voted to deny review in the case.
Six trial court judges chosen last week to consider the state's appeal of a decision awarding current and retired judicial officers $36 million in back pay have unanimously voted to deny review in the case.
October 26, 2018 at 03:35 PM
1 minute read
That was quick.
Six California trial court judges chosen last week to consider the state’s appeal of a decision awarding current and retired judicial officers $36 million in back pay have unanimously voted to deny review in the case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS