A Day of Reckoning for NY Law Firms When the Lease Expires
Manhattan law firm offices are designed to dazzle clients with breathtaking views and the latest wizardry at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars a month. But a decade later when the lease expires, law firms face a day of reckoning.
October 12, 2018 at 09:06 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Manhattan law firm offices are designed to dazzle clients with breathtaking views and the latest wizardry at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars a month. But a decade later when the lease expires, law firms face a day of reckoning.
When Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer folded this year after 47 years, the name partners said they didn't want to take on the long-term financial commitment that a new lease would require. The same was true for Wormser, Kiely, Galef & Jacobs, which disbanded after 80 years. Kornstein Veisz Wexler & Pollard made a similar decision after a 35-year run.
“I miss just a little having a huge corner office overlooking the harbor, having a whole wing of conference rooms and of course you miss the people you worked with,” said John Zulack, 76, who went to Allegaert Berger & Vogel when Flemming Zulack dissolved. “But it was easier when you're 50 or 60 or 65 to sign a new lease for 10 years. But when you're my age, that's an obligation you don't really want to impose on your family.”
Negotiating a lease 10 years out takes quite a bit of prognosticating for any firm. Will the senior partners be healthy? Will they be comfortable with work lives that are as frenetic as when they were 30? Will they be capable of generating the kind of business they did in their prime? But for small and midsize firms In New York's hot real estate market, the expiration of a lease is often a point of no return, leaving some of the senior partners bitter but launching others in exciting new directions.
“So I view the expiration of a lease for a law firm as an opportunity,” said Mark Zauderer who joined Ganfer & Shore (now Ganfer Shore Leeds & Zauderer) when his former partners parted ways. “It's an opportunity for all involved to assess their goals for the future and allow partners with different goals to pursue their objectives whether it be on the one hand retirement or continuance of an active practice. I wanted to practice for a decade or two more and continue to serve my clients with lawyers at my firm who had been working with me.”
Daniel Kornstein, who was 67 when Kornstein Veisz ceased operations in 2015, said he was looking for “a final move that would get him through the rest of his career” when he became a partner at Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady. He said it was a very emotional time for him. “It was like taking down the flag of a place I created,” he said, noting he had been at his own firm since the age of 29.
“It had to end for reasons that were not unusual,” he said. “Always in New York real estate is a major consideration and lease renewals are part of that particularly for small firms and medium firms. ”
He does wish that the partners showed more foresight in planning for secession but thinks his firm is far from alone in failing to do so.
“ Young lawyers need to be taught and trained how to generate business so that when the founders get older or move on, the younger people are able to move right in and take over,” he said.
Andy Heinz, a partner at Desmarais, a growing midsize firm that just negotiated a new lease in the old Helmsley building, said it's crucial to get it right when signing a lease.
“The primary expense of law firms are the people and the lease,” he said. “We didn't want to get into a super expensive place where you're living on the edge all the time.”
Read More:
Flemming Zulack to Dissolve as Senior Partners Find New Law Firms
Another Law Firm Expires Along With Its New York Lease
After 35 years, litigation boutique Kornstein Veisz to Close
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Walt Disney, IBM Denied High Court Review of Old NY Franchise Tax Law
- 2The Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
- 3Is 1st Circuit the New Center for Trump Policy Challenges?
- 4Justices Grill US Government in Venue Dispute Over FDA Vape Challenges
- 5Change Is Coming With the New Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250