Law Firm Mergers Continue at Record Pace Through Third Quarter
Consulting firm Fairfax Associates said the increase in merger activity stems from law firms seeking to improve their market position amid heightening competition.
October 01, 2018 at 03:21 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Law firms completed a record 56 mergers during the first nine months of 2018, according to consulting firm Fairfax Associates—one-third more than the average number of mergers for the same period over the past 10 years.
The 56 mergers through the third quarter marked an increase from the 50 mergers that took place during the same period in 2017. The average number of mergers for the same period over the last 10 years is 42.
Fairfax tracked a total of 20 competed mergers during the third quarter.
Kristin Stark, a Fairfax principal in California, said the high merger activity this year stems from increased competition and firms' interest in seeking to improve their market position.
“This is a reflection of firms facing an intensifying competition for work, an intensifying competition for clients. In their view, they will be more competitive if they have broader talent, better talent, and mergers are how to get there,” Stark said.
Following the trend that emerged in 2018, Stark sees more mid-market combinations in the future because the financials of those firms tend to match up. She said conflicts are the biggest issue causing prospective deals to fall apart, and beyond that financials can be an issue.
Most of the mergers during the third quarter—80 percent—involved smaller firms with five to 25 lawyers. Fairfax reported that the four largest mergers included two combinations within the United States and two cross-border mergers.
The domestic mergers during the third quarter were not concentrated in any one region of the country, according to Fairfax. The 15 domestic mergers were spread among 12 states, with two each in Florida, two in Missouri and two in Ohio. Others states with one merger each are Hawaii, Colorado, Idaho, Minnesota, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Texas.
The largest merger of the third quarter was the joining of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough with Miami-based Broad and Cassel, creating a firm with more than 750 lawyers. The second largest merger involving a U.S. firm was Dentons' tie-up with 44-lawyer Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing of Hawaii.
Dentons was involved in four of the five cross-border mergers completed during the third quarter. The firm combined with Hanafiah Ponggawa & Partners in Indonesia, Zain & Co. in Malaysia, Delany Law in Barbados and Dinner Martin in the Cayman Islands.
The other cross-border mergers involved DLA Piper and the Denmark-based firm Delacour.
According to Fairfax, Dentons has driven much of the cross-border activity over the last three years. It was involved in 46 percent of cross-border mergers in 2016, 32 percent in 2017 and 50 percent through the first three quarters in 2018.
Looking ahead to the rest of 2018 and into 2019, Stark said several markets continue to be a hotbed for merger activity, including Texas, California, New York, Chicago, Washington, D.C., and Boston.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Big Law Profits Vs. Political Values
- 3Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 4Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 5'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250