When Supreme Court Justices Turn to 'Mr. Bumble' to Make a Point: Alito Edition
Justice Samuel Alito Jr. shares with Justice Neil Gorsuch more than just a firm conservative bent. They both have a fondness for a certain Dickens character to make a point about how their colleagues interpret the law.
May 30, 2018 at 02:53 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Justice Samuel Alito speaking at the Federalist Society 2016 National Lawyers Convention. Credit: Federalist Society
Justice Samuel Alito Jr. shares with Justice Neil Gorsuch more than just a firm conservative bent. They both have a fondness for a certain Dickens character to make a point about how their colleagues interpret the law.
Alito stood alone in dissent this week in a key Fourth Amendment decision. He found unreasonable the majority's disapproval of a police officer's warrantless search of a motorcycle parked in the driveway of a home.
To drive home his point, Alito turned to Mr. Bumble:
An ordinary person of common sense would react to the court's decision the way Mr. Bumble famously responded when told about a legal rule that did not comport with the reality of everyday life,” Alito wrote. “If that is the law, he exclaimed, 'the law is a ass—a idiot.' C. Dickens, Oliver Twist 277 (1867).
Two years ago, Gorsuch, then a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, famously borrowed the same character and quote from the Charles Dickens novel, “Oliver Twist,” in his dissent in the case of the burping middle school boy. A school police officer arrested the boy who refused to stop generating fake burps. The boy was charged with disrupting the education process and suspended from school. His mother sued school officials and the police officer.
Gorsuch, dissenting from the majority's decision in favor of the school officials and police officer, wrote:
Often enough the law can be “a ass—a idiot,” Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist 520 (Dodd, Mead & Co. 1941) (1838)—and there is little we judges can do about it, for it is (or should be) emphatically our job to apply, not rewrite, the law enacted by the people's representatives. … It's only that, in this particular case, I don't believe the law happens to be quite as much of a ass [sic] as they do.
The legal writing guru Ross Guberman wrote of Gorsuch's literary reference: “Like Justice [Antonin] Scalia, Judge Gorsuch is nothing if not erudite. Many judges cite Charles Dickens's 'Bleak House,' so I appreciate Gorsuch's amusing reference to 'Oliver Twist.'”
A quick search of Brigham Young University's Corpus, home to about 130 million words in 32,000 Supreme Court decisions from the 1790s to the present, revealed that at least two other justices have turned to Mr. Bumble's infamous comment.
The earliest use was in the 1959 decision In re Sawyer, by Justice William Brennan. The court was reviewing a lawyer's one-year suspension from the practice of law flowing in part from interviews she conducted with one of the jurors after the trial.
Brennan wrote: “How any of this reflected on Judge Wiig, except insofar as he might be thought to lose stature because he was a judge in a legal system said to be full of imperfections, is not shown. To say that 'the law is a ass, a idiot' is not to impugn the character of those who must administer it. To say that prosecutors are corrupt is not to impugn the character of judges who might be unaware of it, or be able to find no method under the law of restraining them.”
Nearly two decades later, in a case argued and won by then-ACLU lawyer Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Mr. Bumble appeared in a concurring opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens. The case, Califano v. Goldfarb, struck down the different treatment of widows and widowers for awarding Social Security survivor benefits.
Stevens, who concurred in the judgment, addressed the 19th century presumption that females were inferior to males. He explained in a footnote:
This presumption was expressly recognized in the literature of the 19th century. It was this presumption that Mr. Bumble ridiculed when he disclaimed responsibility for his wife's misconduct. Because a part of his disclaimer is so well known, it may not be inappropriate to quote the entire passage:
“It was all Mrs. Bumble. She would do it,” urged Mr. Bumble, first looking round to ascertain that his partner had left the room.
“That is no excuse,” replied Mr. Brownlow. “You were present on the occasion of the destruction of these trinkets, and, indeed, are the more guilty of the two in the eye of the law, for the law supposes that your wife acts under your direction.”
“If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble, squeezing his hat emphatically in both hands, “the law is a ass—a idiot. If that's the eye of the law, the law's a bachelor; and the worst I wish the law is that his eye may be opened by experience—by experience.”
Although Dickens can claim credit for making the phrase famous, the British website The Phrase Finder says “the law is an ass” first appeared in a play published by dramatist George Chapman in 1654—”Revenge for Honour”: “Ere he shall lose an eye for such trifle. … For doing deeds of nature! I'm ashamed. The law is such an ass.”
The Phrase Finder adds that “ass” is the English colloquial name for a donkey, “not the American 'ass,' which we will leave behind us at this point.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUvalde Shooting 'Fresh in Everyone's Mind:' Lone Dissenting Judge Disagrees with School's Disciplinary Decision Over Pellet Gun
Paul Weiss, Trailblazer for US Firms in China, to Close Beijing Office
3 minute readNew University of Chicago Law Course Digs Deeper Into Using Gen AI Responsibly
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250