Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
(L to R) Joshua Wong, Nathan Law, and Alex Chow, Hong Kong protest leaders.

A dozen barristers and judges, including Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher London partner Charlie Falconer, QC, penned an open letter on Sunday criticizing a Hong Kong court’s decision to send three student activists to prison for unlawful assembly.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Law Firms Mentioned

[caption id="attachment_523" align="alignnone" width="535"]<img class="wp-image-523 size-full" src="http://www.almcms.com/contrib

    /uploads/sites/396/2017/10/Hong-Kong-Protest-Leaders-Article-201710161744.jpg" width="535" height="372" /> <i>(L to R) Joshua Wong, Nathan Law, and Alex Chow, Hong Kong protest leaders.</i>[/caption] A dozen barristers and judges, including��Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher London partner��Charlie Falconer, QC, penned <a href="https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/10/16/in-full-top-intl-lawyers-condemn-hong-kongs-jailing-of-democracy-activists-as-a-serious-threat-to-the-rule-of-law/" target="_blank">an open letter</a> on Sunday criticizing a Hong Kong court's decision to <a href="http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2107216/occupy-activists-joshua-wong-and-nathan-law-jailed-hong-kong" target="_blank">send three student activists to prison</a> for��unlawful assembly. In August, Joshua Wong, Alex Chow and Nathan Law were sentenced by the Court of Appeal to six-, seven- and eight-month prison terms respectively for their involvement in the Occupy Central pro-democracy protests in 2014. ���As lawyers, we regard the imprisonment of Joshua Wong, Alex Chow and Nathan Law in Hong Kong as a serious threat to the rule of law,��� the open letter says. In addition to Falconer, former��Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice of the U.K. under��Prime Minister Tony Blair, the open letter was also signed by 11 international human rights lawyers, including��former United Nations chief war prosecutor��Desmond Lorenz de Silva, QC,��Kirsty Brimelow QC, chair of the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales, Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, former chief prosecutor in the trial of Slobodan Milo��evi��, and U.S. lawyer��Jared Genser, attorney for the late Chinese dissident and Nobel Peace Prize��laureate Liu Xiaobo and his widow Liu Xia. The August decision came��after the Hong Kong Department of Justice appealed a lighter sentence of community service handed down previously by a lower court. The Court of Appeal decision was��subsequently��<a href="http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2108919/court-finally-releases-english-version-judgment-jailed-hong" target="_blank">criticized by members of the legal community and by the press</a>��for potential breach of the so-called "double jeopardy" principle, which protects defendants from��facing criminal prosecution more than once for the same offense. The open letter also criticizes the Hong Kong��<a href="https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/10/16/in-full-top-intl-lawyers-condemn-hong-kongs-jailing-of-democracy-activists-as-a-serious-threat-to-the-rule-of-law/" target="_blank">Public Order Ordinance</a>���the law used to send the Occupy Central activists to prison. "The Public Order Ordinance is incompatible with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which applies to Hong Kong. Human rights organizations have long urged Hong Kong to revise the ordinance to comply with the ICCPR," the��letter says. Born out of the 1967 riots against British colonel rule, the Public Order Ordinance was most recently amended in 1997, on the eve of the hand over of Hong Kong's sovereignty from Britain to China. The 1997 amendment, which required protest organizers to obtain government approval, has been controversial, as it allowed the government to��restrict��citizens'<a href="http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1078885/protesters-say-public-order-ordinance-restricts-their-rights" target="_blank">��right to publicly assemble</a>. The open letter also accuses the Chinese government for its role in eroding the independence of the judiciary in Hong Kong. "The independence of the judiciary, a pillar of Hong Kong, risks becoming a charade, at the beck and call of the Chinese Communist Party," the letter states, referring to a 2014 government <a href="http://www.international.law.com/id=1202661355875" target="_blank">white paper issued</a> by Beijing stating that the central government has comprehensive jurisdiction over Hong Kong. In August, responding to rising concern about Hong Kong's judicial independence coming under threat after the Court of Appeal decision, the Hong Kong��Bar Association and the Law Society of Hong Kong released a <a href="http://www.hkba.org/sites/default/files/20170818%20-%20Joint%20Statement%20of%20HKBA%20and%20LSHK%20in%20Response%20to%20Criticisms%20of%20Judicial%20Independence%20in%20HK%20%28E%29.pdf" target="_blank">joint statement</a>. "The decisions by the Hong Kong courts are made solely according to law upon applications by one party or the other. We see no indication otherwise in respect of the recent cases which have generated widespread comment," read the statement, referring to the jailing of the student leaders. "Unfounded comments that judicial decisions were made or influenced by political considerations originating outside Hong Kong are unjustified and damaging to our legal system, and to Hong Kong as a whole," the statement said. <

      > Knitter: Too few entities/relations are generated compared to number of concepts (only 98% (79/80) concepts are converted).

      Health Care Fraud: Enforcement and ComplianceBook

      Health Care Benefits Law explains how current laws affect the design and day-to-day administration of health care plans. It also helps you identify and deal with hid...

      Get More Information

      You Can't Manage It If You Don't Measure It

      How are you illustrating differentiation to clients and potential lateral targets? How are you measuring performance against peers? Use Legal Compass to benchmark a firm against its competitors, unearthing unique insights about performance, partner retention, market penetration and more. Click to log in, or begin your free trial.

      Get More Information

      WIPL.UK Awards 2021Event

      The WIPL.UK Awards honors the industry standouts and rising stars who are making a mark within the profession.

      Get More Information

      ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

      Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

      As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

      Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.