Search Results

0 results for 'cayuga'

You can use to get even better search results
February 13, 2004 |

U.S. Supreme Court Tackles VMI Prayers

The U.S. Supreme Court may decide next week to consider whether the Virginia Military Institute's longstanding tradition of praying before dinner violates the First Amendment.
5 minute read
September 01, 2010 |

News In Brief

5 minute read
September 30, 2004 |

Firms Sidle Up to Budding Practice: Indian Gaming

Heidi McNeil Staudenmaier jokes that one Indian law course in law school made her the firm's expert on Indian legal matters when she landed her first job as a business litigator in 1985. It's no joke now. In the past decade, Indian law issues have steadily expanded to fill most of Staudenmaier's workload at Snell & Wilmer's Phoenix office. And a growing amount of that work stems from issues related to Indian gaming.
8 minute read
June 14, 2004 |

Newsbriefs

4 minute read
November 12, 2010 |

News In Brief

5 minute read
November 06, 2008 |

Appellate Judges Swamped In Democratic Vote Surge

Republican Supreme Court Justice Anthony J. Carpinello yesterday blamed a Democratic run on the polls not seen in more than four decades for his Election Day defeat and the impending loss of the Appellate Division, Third Department, seat he has held since 1996. Justice Carpinello was one of three Appellate Division justices, all Republicans, who lost their Supreme Court seats on Tuesday when New York voters overwhelmingly backed Democratic President-Elect Barack Obama and gave Democrats a majority in the state Senate for the first time in 43 years. Other Appellate Division justices losing re-election bids were Robert J. Lunn, a Fourth Department justice since 2006 who also had experience on the Second Department bench, and Second Department Justice Robert A. Lifson, who was named to that bench in 2004.
7 minute read
December 28, 2007 |

N.Y. vs. Federal Provisional Remedies for Choice of Forum

Gary J. Mennitt and Joseph F. Donley, partners at Dechert, write that forum selection may be the most important decision made in a matter where diversity jurisdiction is supportable or a nonexclusive federal claim may be asserted. The import of this decision is often most immediate when the action to be commenced will seek extraordinary pretrial relief, i.e., a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, attachment, or receivership. Such forum choice should not be informed by instinct alone.
14 minute read
September 27, 2004 |

List of Ineligible Attorneys - NJ by County

Notice to the bar.
145 minute read
September 25, 2008 |

2008 Ineligible List

Notice to the bar.
372 minute read
September 30, 2002 |

Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection List of Ineligible Attorneys

Notice to the bar.
684 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Creating a Culture of Compliance

      Brought to you by Ironclad

      Download Now

    • A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software

      Brought to you by PracticePanther

      Download Now

    • A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster

      Brought to you by HaystackID

      Download Now

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now