0 results for 'Mayer Brown'
Maryland Signs Data Privacy Act Into Law—And Bucks Several Privacy Trends
The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 will go into effect on Oct. 1, 2025, and will bring new stringent protections for children's data and biometric data, among other unique requirements.
Susman Godfrey, McGuireWoods Lawyers Clash Over IDEA System in Virginia Before 4th Circuit
"It's only after a year and a half of investigation, more than $1 million in attorney time, it took to develop and find the information that's pled in our complaint, and to bring this case before this court," Susman Godfrey partner William Merrill told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
Runners-up this week include litigators at Cooley, Kramer Levin and Varnum.
Intimidation and Greed: Experts Speak Out on Big Law's Role in Perpetuating Child Labour
Those involved in high-profile cases believe that, despite waving the ESG flag, the world's top law firms play a critical role in exacerbating one of global society's greatest ills.
Mintz Hires Manatt's Data Privacy Leader, 2 Colleagues in Boston Expansion
Scott Lashway, who had founded Manatt's Boston office in 2019, now serves as co-chair of Mintz's data privacy and cybersecurity practice.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, Second Edition
Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Mayer Brown"
Appellate Division, Second Department: May 8, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-05-08 Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity |
Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Motion List & Order on Application released on:May 6, 2024
'Obviously Unconstitutional': TikTok Challenges Law That Could Ban the App in the US
"If upheld, (the statute) would allow the government to decide that a company may no longer own and publish the innovative and unique speech platform it created," the company's complaint states.