0 results for 'EEOC'
Commentary: Rough Justice is Better Than No Justice at All
Catholic University law professor Suzette Malveaux writes about the impact of Dukes v. Wal-Mart and argues that a decision to make it harder for workers to come together as a class will "undermine those fighting to rid society of systemic discrimination."Taking Steps to Reduce the Cost of Workplace Conflict
Workplace conflict can be very expensive for businesses — and that expense has been increasing over the last 10 years, due to higher jury verdicts, attorney fees and other costs, as well as an increase in the number of these conflicts. Businesses can reduce their liability in this area by taking steps to prevent conflicts before they arise, and to resolve them as early as possible, before they grow into full-blown disputes.Honigman, Former Firm Chair Sued by Ex-Assistant Over Discrimination Claims
Denise Fitzhenry, a former executive assistant to Honigman vice chair and one-time Chairman Alan Schwartz, has sued Schwartz and the law firm for allegedly discriminating against her following an injury. Fitzhenry's lawyer, Deborah Gordon, claims that the atmosphere at Honigman is more akin to an episode of "Mad Men" than a modern workplace. Gordon also claims secretaries at the firm were required to wear high heels and that Fitzhenry received her initial injury when she caught her heel on a carpet in Honigman's office.In emotionally revealing book, Justice Thomas is most critical of himself
Clarence Thomas' brutally self-critical autobiography, "My Grandfather's Son," bears little resemblance to most early accounts of the book's contents, legal scholar David Garrow writes. To call "My Grandfather's Son" "emotionally revealing" would be the understatement of the year, Garrow says, and fatuous op-ed columnists who insistently declare that Thomas is just bitterly wallowing in self-pity have either failed to read the book or possess an undeclared bias that overwhelmed their critical faculties.High Court Increases Appeals Odds for Federal Class-Action Settlements
The U.S. Supreme Court last Monday brought new uncertainty to federal class-action settlements by making them vulnerable to appeals by plaintiffs who are not named in a suit.Former dentistry professor sues Tufts for sex discrimination
A former department chairwoman at Tufts University's dental school is suing for sex discrimination and retaliation, alleging she earned a lower salary than a male counterpart.Judgment Entered Against Boies Firm in Sex Discrimination Suit
David Boies' Armonk, N.Y.-based firm, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, has agreed to have a judgment entered against it and to pay $37,500 each to two plaintiffs to settle a wage and sex discrimination suit. The suit was brought by two former female associates, Bonnie Porter and Rachel Baird. Porter said she agreed to the settlement because the firm had taken steps to address the issues raised in the suit.Pharma Sales Reps Are 'Exempt' Employees
U.S. Supreme Court refuses to defer to agency interpretation regarding pharmaceutical sales reps.Reversing earlier decision, 6th Circuit rejects retaliation-by-association claim
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit has taken an about face on its position regarding retaliation by association in the workplace. On June 5, the federal appeals court ruled en banc that relatives and associates of those who file workplace lawsuits or complaints are not protected by retaliation laws.State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now