0 results for 'EEOC'
Judges Cast Skeptical Eyes On Southern Co. Race Suit
Before oral arguments earlier this week, one might have thought Atlanta's federal appeals court wasn't very interested in a high-profile race discrimination suit against Southern Co. and three subsidiaries, including Georgia Power Co.High Court Agrees to Hear Coca-Cola Race Discrimination Appeal, Endangered Species Case
The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to consider a discrimination case in which a Coca-Cola bottling company fired a black employee, one of seven cases the Court added to its docket. The justices also took up an environmental dispute over federal agencies' responsibilities to protect endangered species, a battle between a private prep school and an athletic association over the school's recruiting practices, and a death sentence from Texas -- the fourth this term.'Belligerent' Worker Is Covered by ADA, Says Federal Court
A worker suffering from major depression that makes her belligerent and hypersensitive to criticism has a right under the Americans with Disabilities Act to a reasonable accommodation from her supervisors, a federal judge ruled. Courts, said the judge, have held that "irritability" and "poor judgment" are not mental impairments in themselves, but can be linked to a mental impairment.Gender Discrimination Suit Against Greenberg Stalls Over Arbitration Question
Lawyers for Greenberg Traurig and former shareholder Francine Griesing—who claims the firm is a boys' club that blocks female lawyers from advancing their careers—continue to spar over not just whether the suit belongs in arbitration, but also which of two federal district court judges should decide that question.Hostile Work Environment Claims Go Forward Over Explicit Tirades
Identifying a number of unresolved factual issues, Eastern District Judge Arthur D. Spatt allowed claims of hostile work environment and constructive discharge to proceed, but he dismissed a retaliation claim as unfounded in his decision.Muslim Executive's Suit Can Go Forward
A high-ranking Lebanese-American executive at Advanced Micro Devices Inc., who accused the company's two top officers of sabotaging his career shortly after Sept. 11, 2001, will have his day in court. In a 20-page order released Monday, U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel ruled that there are sufficient grounds for a jury to determine whether AMD discriminated against Walid Maghribi because he was a Muslim and an Arab, creating working conditions that effectively forced him to quit his job.State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now