Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP''

You can use to get even better search results
Cox Commc'ns, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-03-15
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Traynor
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen C. Norman, Jaclyn C. Levy, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Geoffrey P. Eaton, Matthew L. DiRisio, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC; Mitchell G. Stockwell, Joel D. Bush, II, Jeffrey H. Fisher, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA for appellant.
For defendant: A. Thompson Bayliss, Stephen C. Childs, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Hallie B. Levin, Peter G. Neiman, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY; John J. Butts, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA for appellee.
Case number: D69746

The court found that the lower court erred in its interpretation of a section of the settlement agreement between the parties, finding that the subject language was a Type II agreement that left open terms to be negotiated in the future.

February 09, 2022 | Legaltech News

5 Best Practices to Improve Your Tech Implementation Process

Implementation is more complicated than most lawyers and businesses leaders are prepared to take on, yet it can be the most important element of adopting and using the technology. Here are some best practices regarding implementation so you can successfully onboard new solutions.
5 minute read
Mekoya v. Clancy et al.
Publication Date: 2021-08-12
Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Barnes
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Sandra Foster, James Painter, Travis Windsor, (Brennan, Wasden, and Painter, LLC), Savannah, for appellant.
For defendant: Christopher Connor, (Connor & Connor, LLC), Augusta, Kenneth Connor, Anne Moore, (Connor & Connor, LLC), Aiken, for appellee; Joseph Huff, Laurel Landon, (Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP), Augusta, for other party.
Case number: A21A0076

Experts' Testimony Present an Issue of Fact as to Whether Medical Complications Could Have Been Avoided if Doctor Had Properly Diagnosed Condition

Crown Series, LLC et al. v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, LLC
Publication Date: 2020-12-15
Practice Area: Business Torts | Contracts
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Hodges
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John Koenig, (Barnes & Thornburg LLP), Atlanta, Abby Vineyard, (Attorney at Law), Atlanta, Marty Schwartz, (Schain, Banks, Kenny & Schwartz, Ltd.), Chicago, for appellant.
For defendant: Michael Tyler, Kathryn Isted, Joe Reynolds, (Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A20A1464

Liquidated Damages Provision of License Agreement Was Enforceable and Demonstrated a Pre-Estimate of Probable Loss

3G Licensing, S.A. v. Blackberry Ltd.
Publication Date: 2020-11-04
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lexie G. White, Hunter Vance, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Houston, TX; Andreas C. Healy, Jenna G. Farleigh, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Seattle, WA for plaintiffs.
For defendant: John V. Gorman, Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric Kraeutler, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Robert C. Bertin, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC; John W. Shaw, Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Yar R. Chaikovsky, Bruce Yen, Alexander H. Lee, Radhesh Devendran, Paul Hastings LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Taylor Ludlam, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC: Steven D. Moore; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, San Francisco, CA; Russel A. Korn, Richard W. Goldstucker, Courtney S. Dabbiere, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, Atlanta, GA for defendants.
Case number: D69174

Defendants' motion for summary judgment on patent infringement claims denied where evidence could allow jury to find that patents-in-suit were directed to patentable subject matter and that the accused products infringed upon the patent claims under the doctrine of equivalents.

Appellate Division, Second Department:September 2, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-09-04
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department:September 2, 2020

Appellate Division, First Department:July 10, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-07-13
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department:July 10, 2020

Comcast Corp. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n
Publication Date: 2020-03-11
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Electronics
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Pauline Newman
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Donald B. Verrilli, JR., Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellants. Appellants Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Comcast Business Communications, LLC, Comcast Holdings Corporation, Comcast Shared Services, LLC also represented by Ginger Anders; David Lisson, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLC, Menlo Park, CA; Steven Anzalone, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC.
For defendant: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Ronald Traud, Dominic L. Bianchi, Wayne W. Herrington. Jeffrey A. Lamken, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenors. Also represented by Michael Gregory Pattillo, JR., Rayiner Hashem; Roderick George Dorman, McKool Smith PC, Los Angeles, CA; Joshua Wright Budwin, Joel Lance Thollander, Austin, TX; Douglas Aaron Cawley, Dallas, TX; John M. Whealan, Chevy Chase, MD. Mitchell G. Stockwell, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for appellants ARRIS Enterprises, Inc., ARRIS Global Ltd., ARRIS Group, Inc., ARRIS International plc, ARRIS Solutions, Inc., ARRIS Technology, Inc., Pace Americas, LLC. Also represented by Joshua Hamilton Lee, Michael Turton; Matthew Meyer, Menlo Park, CA; Joshua B. Pond, Washington, DC. Paul M. Bartkowski, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP, Washington, DC, for appellants Technicolor, S.A., Technicolor Connected Home USA LLC, Technicolor USA, Inc. John Thorne, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Verizon Services Corp. Also represented by Gregory G. Rapawy, Ariela M. Migdal.
Case number: 2018-1450

Comcast's X1 Boxes Infringed on Patents After Importation Contrary to Tariff Act §337

U.S. Bank National Association v. CCCF River Glen Holdings, Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-12-21
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Judge: Unsigned Smith, J.P., Peradotto, DeJoseph, Nemoyer, and Troutman, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1185

U.S. Bank National Association v. CCCF River Glen Holdings, Inc.

U.S. Bank National Association v. CCCF River Glen Holdings, Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-12-21
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Judge: Unsigned Smith, J.P., Peradotto, DeJoseph, Nemoyer, and Troutman, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1184

U.S. Bank National Association v. CCCF River Glen Holdings, Inc.

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources