0 results for 'cayuga'
Oneida Nation of New York v. Cuomo, 10-4265(L)
Publication Date: 2011-05-11 Practice Area:
Industry: Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Judge: Before: Wesley, Chin, and Lohier, C.JJ. Attorneys: For plaintiff: Riyaz A. Kanji (Cory J. Albright, Zach Welcker, Kanji & Katzen, PLLC; Christopher Karns, Owen Herne, Seneca Nation of Indians Department of Justice, Salamanca, NY; Carol E. Heckman, Jeffrey A. Wadsworth, David T. Archer, Harter Secrest & Emery LLP, Buffalo, NY, on the brief), Kanji & Katzen, PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant Seneca Nation of Indians. David W. Debruin (Scott B. Wilkens, Joshua M. Segal, Jenner & Block, LLP; Daniel French, Lee Alcott, French-Alcott, PLLC, Syracuse, NY, on the brief), Jenner & Block, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Intervenor-Appellant Cayuga Indian Nation of New York. James M. Wicks (George C. Pratt, Hillary A. Frommer, Farrell Fritz, P.C.; James F. Simermeyer, New York, NY, on the brief), Farrell Fritz, P.C., Uniondale, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant Unkechauge Indian Nation. Michael L. Roy (Marsha K. Schmidt, on the brief), Hobbs, Straus, Dean & Walker, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant St. Regis Mohawk Tribe. Michael R. Smith (R. Miles Clark, Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP; Peter D. Carmen, Meghan Murphy Beakman, Oneida Nation Legal Department, Verona, NY; Daniel F. Katz, Dennis M. Black, Williams & Connolly, LLP, Washington D.C., on the brief), Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee Oneida Nation of New York. For defendant: Andrew D. Bing (Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Alison J. Nathan, Special Counsel to the Solicitor General, Steven C. Wu, Assistant Solicitor General, on the brief), Deputy Solicitor General, for Defendants-Appellants Andrew M. Cuomo, Thomas H. Mattox, Richard Ernst, and Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee John Melville. Michael T. Feeley (Lisa A. Coppola, on the brief), Rupp, Baase, Pfalzgraf, Cunningham & Coppola LLC, Buffalo, NY, for Amicus Curiae Akwesasne Convenience Store Association. Michael A. Cardozo (Eric Proshansky, Aaron M. Bloom, William H. Miller, on the brief), Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae the City of New York. Richard T. Sullivan, Harris Beach PLLC, Buffalo, NY, for Amicus Curiae New York Association of Convenience Stores. Thomas G. Jackson (Meagan A. Zapotocky, on the brief), Phillips Nizer, LLP, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae New York State Association of Tobacco and Candy Distributors, Inc.* Case number: 10-4265(L)
Cite as: Oneida Nation of New York v. Cuomo, 10-4265(L), NYLJ 1202493468026, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 9, 2011)Before: Wesley, Chin, and Lohier, C.JJ.p c
Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki
$248 Million Award to Cayuga Nation Reversed; Laches Applies to Viable Indian Land Claims
Jenner & Block Wins Ruling for Cauygas over Cigarette Sales
Publication Date: 2009-07-14 Practice Area: Industry: Court: Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number:
For Native American tribes, cigarette sales are a huge source of revenue. So a decision issued on Friday by a state appellate court in New York declaring that the Cayuga Indian Nation can sell cigarettes tax free to non members is welcome news for all tribes in the state. Jenner & Block partner David DeBruin, an attorney for the Cayuga Nation, gave us some background on the case Tuesday.
2nd Circuit Reverses $248 Mil. Cayuga Award
A $248 million award to the Cayuga Indian Nation of New York for land dispossession more than 200 years ago has been reversed by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.City of New York v. Golden Feather Smoke Shop, Inc.
Free With Registration: Circuit Certifies Question to State High Court on Sale of Untaxed Cigarettes on Reservation2nd Circuit Reverses $248 Million Cayuga Award
A $248 million award to the Cayuga Indian Nation of New York for land dispossession more than 200 years ago has been reversed by the 2nd Circuit. Citing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling released earlier this year, the circuit found that New York state must prevail because of the long delay by the Cayuga Nation in pursuing its claim for ejectment of the defendant land owners and repossession of its land. The action focused on land exempted from a 1789 treaty between the Cayugas and New York.200-Year-Old Land Dispute Nets $247.9 Million
A 200-year-old dispute over the ownership of a 64,000-acre tract of land in upstate New York has led to a $247.9 million judgment against the state of New York. A federal judge ordered the state to pay $211 million in interest on a $36.9 million verdict awarded to the Cayuga Indian Nation after the Cayugas charged that New York purchased the land two centuries earlier in violation of the U.S. Trade and Intercourse Act.Cases Highlight Unique Status of American Indian Lands
Damaris E. Torrent, an assistant deputy counsel at the New York State Judicial Institute, writes that the history of litigation relating to the status of American American Indian lands in New York has taken a number of twists and turns, with watershed cases reaching the U.S. Supreme Court on three notable occasions.Trending Stories
- 1A Novel (and 'Funnier') Ranking System for Law Schools: How Many Mentions in the Times
- 2Ex-Judge Tatel Regrets Focusing Clerk Hiring on Applicants from Elite Law Schools
- 3Insights on M&A Trends: Midyear 2024 Expert Roundtable
- 4Dallas Firm That Won $45M Talc Verdict Scored Again: Jury Hits J&J With $260M
- 5It's Not Just the Spread. Big Law Is Making More 'Business-Driven' Pay Choices
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now