Search Results

0 results for 'Mayer Brown'

You can use to get even better search results
April 10, 2024 | Law.com

Hogan Lovells Hires 6-Lawyer Team, Including Former French Energy Regulator, in Paris

In other Paris moves, Herbert Smith Freehills got back a veteran banking and finance partner from a French firm, and a veteran Big Law arbitration partner started his own firm.
4 minute read
April 09, 2024 | The American Lawyer

An Early Look: The 2024 Am Law 200 Financials

This feed is continually updated. So bookmark it, check back regularly, and stay tuned for the Am Law 100 and Second Hundred reports coming soon.
17 minute read
April 04, 2024 | Texas Lawyer

Mayer Brown Lands $10.3M Verdict for Korean Cellphone Manufacturer

The week-long trial concluded with jury findings that Chinese company OnePlus willfully infringed five of cellphone maker Pantech's patents related to wireless communication and user interface technologies used in OnePlus' smartphones.
3 minute read
April 04, 2024 | National Law Journal

Mayer Brown Lands $10.3M Verdict for Korean Cellphone Manufacturer in US Court

The week-long trial concluded with jury findings that Chinese company OnePlus willfully infringed five of cellphone maker Pantech's patents related to wireless communication and user interface technologies used in OnePlus' smartphones.
3 minute read
Wozniak v. Warner Bros. Ent. Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-04-04
Practice Area: Copyrights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 22 Civ. 8969

Copyright Infringement Claims Over Batman Dismissed Against Warner Bros., DC Comics

April 03, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Licensees in the Ordinary Course of Business: What's Exclusive and What's Not

'North Star' underscores the important distinction between nonexclusive and exclusive license agreements when foreclosing on a licensed asset. A licensee seeking to acquire use rights in trademarks encumbered by a perfected security interest should weigh the benefits under Section 9-321 of a nonexclusive license against possible commercial advantages of an exclusive license.
9 minute read
Appellate Division, Second Department: March 29, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-03-29
Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Motion List & Order on Application released on:March 27, 2024

March 28, 2024 | The American Lawyer

'Puppy Yoga is Not a Wellbeing Strategy': Are Law Firms Doing Enough on Mental Health?

The campaign for mental health in the legal industry has surged in the last month following the Vanessa Ford tragedy, but hardly any firms appear to be considering changes to their wellbeing programs.
10 minute read
March 28, 2024 | Law.com

'Puppy Yoga is Not a Wellbeing Strategy': Are Law Firms Doing Enough on Mental Health?

The campaign for mental health in the legal industry has surged in the last month following the Vanessa Ford tragedy, but hardly any firms appear to be considering changes to their wellbeing programmes.
10 minute read
In re: RGN-Group Holdings, LLC
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Ambro
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John Bash, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Austin, TX; Daniel C. Posner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Eric W. Pinker, Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann, LLP, Dallas, TX; Ricardo Palacio, Ashby & Geddes, P.A., Wilmington, DE for appellants.
For defendant: Nicole A. Saharsky, Minh Nguyen-Dang, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC; Michael P. Lennon, Charles S. Kelley, Jr., Susan L. Alkadri, Mayer Brown LLP, Houston, TX; Bryan J. Hall, Chipman Brown Cicero & Cole, Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey M. Scott, Archer & Greiner, P.C., Philadelphia, PA for appellee.
Case number: 22-3019

Original tenant could not be held liable under assigned lease which was amended by the landlord and assignee without the original tenant's knowledge or consent.

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources