Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Willkie Farr Gallagher''

You can use to get even better search results
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

To find out how Midlevel associates rate their firms as workplaces, our annual midlevel survey examined 12 areas that contribute to job satisfaction. They include relations with partners and other associates, the interest and satisfaction level asso-ciates have in their work, training and guidance, policy on billables, management openness about firm strategies and partnership chances, the firm?s attitude toward pro bono work, compensation and benefits, and the respondents? inclination to stay at their firm for at least two more years. Respondents graded their firms on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score. On this chart, firms with ten or more responses are ranked by their averages on those questions. Averages include responses from all participating of-fices. For definitions of national and international firms, and for other details, see our methodology
20 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

Smaller firms often outscore larger ones on our annual survey of midlevel job satisfaction. It may be because a more intimate atmosphere breeds happiness. Maybe it's because associates have more responsibility. Perhaps it's because they have a better chance of making partner. In these charts, firms are grouped roughly according to size. In the first category are firms whose annual gross revenues are too low to qualify for the Am Law 200. These are the smallest firms that took part in our survey. In the second category are Am Law Second Hundred firms?numbers 101-200 on the most recent Am Law 200 survey (July.) In the final category are firms that appear on our most recent Am Law 100 (May) or Global 100 (October 2007) survey. For a full methodology, click here.
16 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

Smaller firms often outscore larger ones on our annual survey of midlevel job satisfaction. It may be because a more intimate atmosphere breeds happiness. Maybe it's because associates have more responsibility. Perhaps it's because they have a better chance of making partner. In these charts, firms are grouped roughly according to size. In the first category are firms whose annual gross revenues are too low to qualify for the Am Law 200. These are the smallest firms that took part in our survey. In the second category are Am Law Second Hundred firms?numbers 101-200 on the most recent Am Law 200 survey (July.) In the final category are firms that appear on our most recent Am Law 100 (May) or Global 100 (October 2007) survey. For a full methodology, click here.
16 minute read
October 01, 2009 |

From Russia with Litigation

Legal work may be scarce in some regions, but a bear awakens in the east.
5 minute read
E L Consulting Ltd. v. Doman Industries Limited, 05-1751-cv
Publication Date: 2006-12-21
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Winter
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 05-1751-cv

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT E. Christopher Murray (Megan F. Carroll, on the brief) Reisman, Peirez & Reisman, L.L.P., for Plaintiffs- Appellants. Thomas J.

December 01, 1999 |

Internet Financial Chat Rooms Raise Concerns for Regulators, Companies

While the Internet has empowered American investors with easy access to information and low-cost online trading, the proliferation of false or misleading information in chat rooms and on financial Web sites raises concerns for securities regulators and public companies. In a report on online trading, SEC Commissioner Laura S. Unger of the recommended that the agency conduct, or encourage researchers to conduct, a study analyzing the effect of chat room discussions on corporate stock prices.
8 minute read
United States of America, Appellee v. Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, Defendants, 98-1041L
Publication Date: 2012-11-28
Practice Area: Appeals | Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Walker, Ch.J., Winter and Cabranes, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Appellee United States of America: David N. Kelley and Michael J. Garcia, Assistant United States Attorneys (Mary Jo White, United States Attorney, on the brief, David Raskin, Adam B. Siegel, Jennifer G. Rodgers, James J. Benjamin, Jr., Baruch Weiss, Jamie L. Kogan, Christine H. Chung, Ira M. Feinberg, Assistant United States Attorneys, of counsel), United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellant Ramzi Ahmed Yousef: Bernard V. Kleinman and Steven Z. Legon, White Plains, NY. For Defendant-Appellant Eyad Ismoil: Louis R. Aidala (Joan Palermo, on the brief), New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellant Abdul Hakim Murad: Jerry L. Tritz (Amy J. Porter, on the brief), Law Office of Jerry L. Tritz, New York, NY.
Case number: 98-1041L

Cite as: USA v. Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, 98-1041L, NYLJ 1202579596394, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided April 4, 2003)Before: Walker, Ch.J., Winter and Cabranes, C

In re: Adelphia Communications Corp.
Publication Date: 2005-10-06
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Scheindlin The Ad Hoc Committee of Arahova Noteholders ("Arahova Committee") requests leave to file an expedite

March 16, 2010 |

Full 1st Circuit Rules Prospectus Statements Are Not Attributable to Executives for 10(b)(5) Purposes

The 1st Circuit recently issued an en banc opinion that rejected the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's reliance on prospectus language in bringing a Rule 10(b)(5) case against broker-dealer executives. The decision overturned an earlier panel ruling upholding the SEC's use of the rule, which bars untrue statements in connection with the purchase or sale of a security. The opinion in SEC v. Tambone, on an issue of first impression, rejected "the SEC's expansive interpretation" of the rule.
4 minute read
Tong v. S.A.C. Capital Management LLC, 100509/2007
Publication Date: 2007-06-18
Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County
Judge: Bernard Fried
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 100509/2007

Justice Bernard J. Fried NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court For Plaintiff: Filippatos PLLC (Parisis G. Filippatos, Esq.) For Defendants: Willkie Far

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources