0 results for ''Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard''
Associates Land Plum Role on Defense Teams at Dewey Trial
From the judge to the defendants to the lead attorneys on both sides, the Dewey & LeBoeuf fraud trial has been dominated by seasoned lawyers, and entirely by men. But the criminal trial has plunged four early to mid-career attorneys on the defense teams—all women—into the thick of a once-in-a-lifetime case.
A Crash Course in Law Firm Disaster
For the associates helping to defend Dewey & LeBoeuf's former leaders, the ongoing Dewey criminal trial has been an eye-opener.
A Crash Course in Law Firm Disaster
For the associates helping to defend Dewey & LeBoeuf's former leaders, the ongoing Dewey criminal trial has been an eye-opener.
Testing New Law, Ray Charles Foundation's Suit Revived
A federal appeals court has revived a lawsuit brought by The Ray Charles Foundation against the musician's children who sought to terminate copyrights to 51 of his songs. The case, brought in 2012, is among the first to test a provision of the Copyright Act that allows an artist, or his or her surviving family members, to terminate copyrights 35 years after they were granted.
Third Circuit Curtails Equitable Mootness Doctrine
A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has narrowed the scope of the equitable mootness doctrine in bankruptcy cases.
NAF Holdings, LLC v. LI & Fung (Trading) Ltd., DeFAX Case No. D66894 (Del. June 24, 2015) Strine, C.J. (10 pages)
Publication Date: 2015-07-15 Practice Area:
Industry: Court: Delaware Supreme Court Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: D66894
'Offensive' Conduct Weighed in Fight Over Website Ownership
One of the business owners of NewYork.com could have damaged his company's reputation by acting offensively in front of other employees, Delaware Court of Chancery Vice Chancellor Donald F. Parsons Jr. has ruled in a fight over the future ownership of the website domain.
Subsidiary Shareholder May Sue Parent Corporation Directly
A stockholder in a subsidiary does not have to bring a shareholder derivative lawsuit in order to sue for breach of contract just because its only damages are the benefits its subsidiary would have received from the contract as a third-party beneficiary, the Delaware Supreme Court has ruled.
Subsidiary Shareholder May Sue Parent Corporation Directly
A stockholder in a subsidiary does not have to bring a shareholder derivative lawsuit in order to sue for breach of contract just because its only damages are the benefits its subsidiary would have received from the contract as a third-party beneficiary, the Delaware Supreme Court has ruled.Trending Stories
- 1Joshua Wright's $108M Defamation Case Against Former Students to Proceed to Trial
- 2AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 3Future of Litigation: Keeping Pace with the Rapid Rate of Change
- 4How Attorney Titles in Big Law Can Mean Everything, and Nothing, All at Once
- 5US Jury Finds Chiquita Liable for Colombia Terror Deaths
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now