C.A. 1st; A145992 The First Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that the potential for protests at the site of a proposed Planned…
September 19, 2017 at 04:41 PM
1 minute read
C.A. 1st;
A145992
The First Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that the potential for protests at the site of a proposed Planned Parenthood clinic did not constitute the type of “unusual circumstances” needed to trigger further review of the project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
