9th Cir.;
16-16070
The court of appeals affirmed a district court order. The court held that the scope of an employee arbitration agreement did not encompass the employee’s qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act (FCA).
9th Cir.; 16-16070 The court of appeals affirmed a district court order. The court held that the scope of an employee arbitration agreement did not encompass…
September 12, 2017 at 06:26 PM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
16-16070
The court of appeals affirmed a district court order. The court held that the scope of an employee arbitration agreement did not encompass the employee’s qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act (FCA).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS